Stormygeddon

joined 2 years ago
[–] Stormygeddon@startrek.website 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

I was worried that a high five was relegated to habits of the ancient past when the Lanthanite was initiating with no reciprocation, but then the post credits scene with Spock teaching human mannerisms showed it's still a thing.

When I noticed that this week's intro was being done in a Vulcan manner, I was hoping they would take the opportunity to fix the infamous grammatical mistake^1^ and say "to go boldly" with an unsplit infinitive just this once.

Vulcan Pike's hair reminds me of my old Dark Eldar figures.

I was wondering if the federation ban on advantageous genetic manipulation would have been implemented as a rule to stop the "four Vulcans" from choosing to remain Vulcan, but the episode didn't go there.

I found the use of bacon/cheese/animal products a little un-Trek-like in this episode. Comments against veganism felt a little weird in an era of food synthesizers and the general vision of "we don't enslave animals for food." It's not like vegan food is disgusting. Spock confirmed humans still eat inordinate amounts of cheese and meat with implications that it's often to the point that it's unhealthy. Is it still illogical to have some animal protein if it's problems regarding ecological efficiency are a solved issue (beyond the saturated fat and caloric arguments)? IDK, something felt off.

I didn't appreciate that despite the extra long (and extra long feeling) runtime of this one they had three of the Vulcans return to human off screen. I was kind of hoping for a Steven Universe type situation where they emotionally explore the core of these beloved characters and get reminded of who they are.

Overall, this episode was pretty cringe inducing. I'm kind of shocked to say I straight up did not like this episode. The secondhand embarrassment was too much for me to handle. Painfully unfunny scenes went for too long. The conflict resolution wasn't to my liking, feeling like a missed opportunity to explore character instead going for cheap gags—dinner with the boss sitcom, overbearing girlfriend, lie holding up more lies until the lies implode, pretending to be married, "we want our jerk back"—stuff we've seen thousands of times. I wasn't a big fan of the previous episode either so I'm just kind of put off that they've had two "duds" in a row where SNW usually had bangers in my opinion. Maybe I'll be kinder to this one upon a rewatch.

[–] Stormygeddon@startrek.website 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What even is he eating? A taco?

I was hoping they'd "fix" the infamous grammatical error and say "to go boldly" for this one.

[–] Stormygeddon@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bold choice to have an in universe documentary made by an in universe bad/unprofessional documentarian. It makes the episode feel bad.

Also feels like 10 or so minutes were redacted considering the short length.

 

Warning: I'm probably the only one to find this joke about outdated abbreviations funny.

The first time in a decade where the sci-fi protagonists were wearing visored helmets that weren't transparent and lighting up their faces -- at least until the visor magically folded away.

Minor pet peeve to have, I know. I imagine the choice wasn't director induced and more something regarding stunt coordination but I wouldn't rule out thematically mirroring the faceless unempathic enemy.

[–] Stormygeddon@startrek.website 13 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

add +2 to the "some sort/kind of" count

La'an saying "fascinating" makes me wonder if Spock is rubbing off on her.

For some reason I knew Pelia was going to say "heebie jeebies"

[–] Stormygeddon@startrek.website -2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I feel like this parallels the story about spending of $10 million to research and develop a Space Pen vs just using pencils.

Same here but my AC is actually broken

The TNG references with the chair gag and wearing jeans BTS really got me.

[–] Stormygeddon@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Eh, I get a horror episode is something ST does all the time but I just didn't like this Plant et Zombies episode.

[–] Stormygeddon@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Might be a bit off beat to say this, but maybe the first episode of Prodigy?

It's very much intended as an entry point into Star Trek for those unexposed to Star Trek.

I'm reminded how I basically never bought a Star Trek merch as much as I like the shows.

 

The whales Gracie and George were stated to have wandered into San Francisco as calves. Outside of feeding events which can include the famous bubble nets, humpback whale pods usually consist of a lone mother and calf (or calves) pairing with a trailing "escort" male. Humpbacks are one of the few mammals that can be nursing and still get pregnant. So anyway, the implication seems to be that if they were both calves and coming in the same time as a pod, they must have been orphaned from their mother and part of the same family group. Therefore, when its later revealed that Gracie is pregnant this one question comes to mind:

"Was the pregnancy a product of incest?"

No wonder they were originally going to be called Adam and Evie.

 
 
 
 

The show had already established how Tendi has green blood earlier in the series after an injury and it would have been an easy to infer detail compared to humans in the show.

Other animated shows like Steven Universe already show how non-pink blush colors can work in animation.

 
 

By that I mean that the basic premise being: that the means of (re)creating new technology is lost, the current technology around is treated as sacred and the function marred in elaborate rituals or prayers because they don't know how to otherwise operate it, and to a lesser extent that new ideas or (often xenophillic) research is met with suspicion or outright rejected because it doesn't fit with the religious dogma.

I keep feeling that a similar group is somewhere in Star Trek, right on the cusp of my memory, but I can't seem to recall any specific examples.

view more: next ›