[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago

Wait, they can just replace their shells with regular clothes??

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

I still haven't adopted to this git switch thing

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

It tried, I guess? Apparently the model wasn't trained enough on human gore/medical stuff

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

As a former civil engineer who now works in software, "software engineer" irks me. "Engineer" means you're supposed to be licensed

This really depends on the country you live in. In some countries you need a license, some need you to have some kind of university degree and others don't care at all. So we cannot really use that measure as a definition.

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

By that definition almost all people who call themselves software engineers would be wrong. That doesn't automatically mean, you're wrong though.

Personally, I disagree with your definition of software engineers needing to directly interact with hardware stuff in order to be engineers. Wikipedia defines software engineering as

the application of systematic desciplined, quantifiable approach to development, operation and maintenance of software and the study of these approaches; that is, the application of engineering and computer science to software.

So it's all about the systematic approach to complex systems, not about whether or not you directly interact with hardware interfaces.

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

Intuitively that makes perfect sense to me, since young and attractive humans is what people generate most often

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

Thanks for explaining, I didn't know any of this!

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

How do they have x-ray vision?

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago

Wait, what happened?

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Imo for configs it's fine having a config file that's accessed via static methods or a singleton. I'm open to any good arguments against that practice though.

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Why though? I've got no problem when Google sometimes leads me to an old reddit post. No need to have them all duplicated on lemmy. Let's just make lemmy the place for the new content

[-] ShrimpsIsBugs@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I also think, we'll have ads at some point - and that's perfectly fine and understandable as long as these ads aren't too many and aren't too intrusive. My hope is that because of lemmy's federated nature a healthy competition will emerge. So whenever an instance starts overloading the users with ads, users will just move to another instance with less adds at the blink of an eye.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ShrimpsIsBugs

joined 1 year ago