Onomatopoeia

They read the question just fine, YOU just didn't like their answer, and are looking for ways to show how wrong they are.

Keep on willfully misreading and mischaracterising what was said to agree with your agenda.

That's really effective in life, so I hear.

Lol, well played, well played

Having the ability to test drinks this simply is somehow a negative to you. What a weird take.

Have you ever even drank alcohol, or been in an environment where this occurs?

There's a vast difference between getting drunk and how incapacitated these drugs make someone. They can even just seem drunk, for a while - at least until their attacker gets them away from the crowd, which is much easier when a drug incapacitates someone so suddenly.

Of course she doesn't, she's surrounded by hollyweirdos.

I guess she's interviewed every parent in the world?

Absolutes like this are always wrong, absolutely.

Hahahaha, you're so biased.

This isn't a theses defense, so stop with the sophistry.

Divide what?

Lemmy isn't a monolithic thing, how would that be divided?

That's only about 30 years too late.

Are they going to stop making shitty food, too?

I suspect we can thank Daniel Webster for trying to simplify spellings. I'm still not sure how I feel about it - I find some words make better sense spelled in the British way, like "behaviour", but I also appreciate the vice homonym spellings.

At least the vice / vise spellings make sense etymologically - they have separate Latin origins (see links). I can't explain why British English doesn't make this distinction, especially since they were different in Old French and Anglo-French.

Klaatu barada nikto