Wait a minute, if you call a Communist “liberal’ they’ll also have an aneurysm. Sooo….
HORSESHOE THEORY CONFIRMED!!1!!1!
Wait a minute, if you call a Communist “liberal’ they’ll also have an aneurysm. Sooo….
HORSESHOE THEORY CONFIRMED!!1!!1!
If I had to guess, the game doesn’t even exist, and is one of the many lies going back to the tongue of NK News; a mouthpiece for the CIA. I could be wrong though; this is just an educated guess given the mountain of ridiculous claims made about the DPRK by western media.
*Let’s. (Sorry, congratulations!)
Отлично, товарищ.
@buttwater, would @DornerStan be correct in his assumption that “buttwater” is healthier than “buttsoda” in the following:
healthier than buttsoda
If so, is that the reason you have chosen that username?
Unrelated, but why that particular username?
Fair enough. Still, it couldn’t hurt to have more of them; or the existing ones gaining more popularity; in my opinion. There are pros and cons to any format of agitation; podcasters and influencers are 1) more modern, and 2) More effective when it comes to radicalising the younger generation, in particular. They just aren’t for everyone, and that’s okay.
I suppose it depends on who the podcast is for: if it’s to dispel western capitalist propaganda about socialist countries, (i.e, @millennialchaos’ Radio Free America; which dispels propaganda against People’s Korea) who’s target audience are liberals in the Imperial Core; repetition of certain points is helpful to bring a point across to as many people as possible. When it comes to ML podcasters, the more people influenced by them, the better.
In short; you, as an ML; probably aren’t the target audience for the podcasts you are referring to.
Everything is getting enshittified these days.