OKRainbowKid

joined 2 years ago
[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why do you carry so much hate with you?

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 months ago

Fuck off. What music do you enjoy? Please share your superior taste.

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And you'd choose 40?

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You don't understand the intended message of this post. The people abstaining from voting because the ice cream is not vegan ARE the "both sides are the same, none will bring real change, that's why I won't vote/vote 3rd party" people that ultimately help steer the bus off the cliff. "Harm reduction" as used in this post is an argument for voting for the better of two realistic outcomes, even if that outcome doesn't meet your purity standards. The point being that one option (bus driving off the cliff) is much much worse than the other.

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 10 months ago (7 children)

So you'd let the bus drive off the cliff because non-vegan ice cream doesn't fulfill your standards for ice cream?

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago

Pretty accurate portrayal.

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This gives me "old man yelling at clouds" energy.

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 11 months ago

I understood this reference.

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You bringing up Russia/Ukraine out of nowhere in a thread about Israel/Iran? Absolutely!

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Fair! I was following your example though :)

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Feel free to call out these comments when you encounter them and provide nuance. I will keep trying to do the same :)

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So why are you putting words in other people's mouths? So you have something to argue against that wasn't even brought up earlier?

view more: next ›