[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

By the way, the evolutionary reason is far more interesting. We need to wear clothes in cold weather because we don't have fur. Why did we evolve to not have fur? Because not having fur allows humans to sweat. Sweating is the most effective way to get rid of excess body heat, far better then panting that many mammals use. This allows humans to run without stopping for much longer than animals, allowing humans to hunt animals by chasing them until they tire out and stop.

Of course, other animals could not evolve sweating because they are unable to use clothes and fire to keep themselves warm without fur.

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

XMPP is often neglected even though it’s the most secure, private, fast, and reliable framework for end-to-end encrypted messengers.

This. I studied on how e2ee works in XMPP when I was trying it a few years back. It is absolutely atrocious. I have seen half-assed school projects with better security than most XMPP clients. Largely caused by encryption being bolted on through an extensions of the standard as an afterthought and going throug several revisions. Its usually not even enabled by default.

Now you may find a good client implementation, I think conversations for android seemd decent, but with everyone using a different client and no way to ensure the other side uses a secure one, there is little point.

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This post is the personification of why downvotes should be enabled.

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 2 points 8 months ago

Sure, but there are good reasons not to use XMPP if you need security.

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 20 points 9 months ago

As I understand it, it is not impossible, just too much effort to register an esim without google services. However, once registered, they are not needed anymore. So one solution is to register the esim on stock android before installing a custom ROM.

GrapheneOS has an even better solution where you can temporarily install google services in userspace and give them control of the esim module to register an esim and then remove the access and optionally uninstall them.

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 5 points 11 months ago

On one hand, I do want to ask why Frebch people love setting France on fire so much. On the other hand, when shit like this passes as laws, I wonder why we are not setting our countries on fire...

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They should also need it in the US. The issue is, that if the tool is in the hands of the cops, there is no way to check who they spied on (and therefore if they had warrant).

At least if it was executed by a comercial entity, they can check the warrants and be liable if they do it without one. But that is very likely not how it will be implemented. The cops will get the tools to do with as they please.

As an example, one state in the US (forgot which one) put in a law that requires the police to submit every data search warrant into a public database so that they could be audited by the public. After they compared the contents of the database to number of requests in companies transparency reports, it turned out there were over 5 times as many requests in the state then what was reported in the database, despite reporting being required by law.

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 48 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sure, the issue is that, with no transparency, cops will use it even if they are just courios what they friends are doing. This is already known to happen in the US, where cops used it to stalk their SOs or even in extreme cases women they were starting to date.

If they already have the technology in their hands, there is no way to stop them.

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 5 points 11 months ago

I do. GOS club!

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 10 points 11 months ago
[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Quite possibly not. Remember that the admins running lemmy instances have very limited revenue so paying for servers is an issue. Some instances even encourage posting links instead of images to save on cost.

Videos are in a league of their own when it comes to size and therefore the server power needed. Lemmy probably can't afford it. Its the price we pay for freedom and no ads. You have to link videos.

[-] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 5 points 11 months ago

I just wanted to say, those are rookie numbers.

12
view more: next ›

MajesticFlame

joined 1 year ago