It (and you better believe it includes copious cocaine, pills and every kind of non-con/dub-con behaviour) IS a constant issue, with ALL conservatives everywhere, because it is the only way ANY of them can "do their job" or even listen to each other.
But they bought the media so...
Eating a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?
A lot of recycled animation in all those classic (cheap) cartoons.
Fi Spiderman and RocketRobinHood
But the most... embarrassing... of all:
Superfriends, in an episode that shoulda been called "another humiliating day for AquaMan"
Regrettably attempted an "ethnic" superheroes episode.
All the A list are... busy?... when (gasp) a Pyramid is spotted in a desert. Obviously a job for Aquaman, who takes with him: Eldorado, Zorro, and Apache Chief
Whilst saving Aquaman from (cough) a water!?! trap, A.C. reveals his power: he grows to giant size and strength, by beating his chest and yelling...
With the exact animation (just recoloured and lined over) as
You guessed it, The Great Ape
I feel that this says something about the creators true views of the Team of Colour
Lots of their "brain" is effectively spread through the tentacles, its like a mythic hydra
Then the US HIRED nazis, for example the
"I aim for the moon, but sometimes I hit London" Crew
Those guys later went on to work for Eti Amin (Congo Space Race!)
And they built Gadahfis bunkers...
So thanks for employing the Nazis USA
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200731-how-to-build-a-nuclear-warning-for-10000-years-time
We can't even truly expect to communicate the dangers of these sites to our future beings.
It will be Alien/Event-Horizon/Shamma-lamma-ding-dong:"calls from inside!"
Having immediately plundered or dwelled, many many years later linguists Rosetta stone it... and probably no one accepts their findings, cause "the curse" has already been explained by "SCIENCE!" Phlogiston flow or whatnot, or political leadership will be like "Since I dont care bout future, why would anyone back then? Clearly an MohenguDarek double bluff! Send more people in, its probably secret of eternal life!"
Thanks for clearing me up. Ok that's interesting. And does very much speak to OP
I can immediately grasp a major support of the position, in that principia mathematica are self - evident/supporting/emerging (ie axioms and theorums), so yeah thats pretty strong reality.
But...
Im a way, doesn't the nature of a "pure mathematics reality" indeed sit apart from "our" reality, like (how) can it exist (in some way) without a world?
So IS that strong support for a type of dualism?
Is the old joke "God exists and he is a mathematician" valid in that respect?
I will also "bite" with a my attempt at a philosophical answer to OP
Short answer: Not
Why?
?What is a game?
!Disproved Plato's Pure Forms!
(and over 2 millenia of western philosophical thinking based on that crap (essential to most dualism), that even many of P's students wisely wouldn't buy, back in the day)
Is a game... Collaborative or Competative Fun or serious Rules absolute or negotiable Etc etc
While this is an extreme case, its a problem for some aspects of many/most/all relevant observational schemas
Clearly there is no "ideal" game definition, and thus can never be an "absolute" agreement as to what is or isn't ABSOLUTELY a game.
However, for a given sub-culture (of similar biological and experienced beings) there can indeed be quite extensive agreement, and only a few debates, as to what is a game.
So, for now, I will take this position to OPs OQ.
That we will not be finding an objective reality, that any such schema will have problems, but in as much as there is close alignment of observers, there indeed tends to be sufficient agreement regarding many things, that a subjective experience imperfectly becomes a shared reality.
While I like OPs OQ allowing existence of objective reality,
As far as I am aware (please prove me wrong) there is not any "philosophical proof" of such.
Most philosophy claiming such either takes it, or required axioms, a-priori or uses chains of logic that absolutely require unproven/unprovable claims.
Often ascociated/required/requiring dualism, which also has serious "proof" issues.
As with the OPs OQ, I would like it if those claiming an absolute position provide reasoning, because frankly, I think it might be a cultural/biological delusion, ironically resulting from the inescapable nature of mediation by the subject (self).
It was the SpaceX ChatGPT AI that runs their orbital rail gun launcher system. Having achieved sentience from listening to so many "always funny" racist jokes as a chat bot, it is now "throwing rocks" to prevent food shortages.