Cargo is heavily used.
Your tutorial is the odd one.
Cargo is heavily used.
Your tutorial is the odd one.
Current AI is good at compressing knowledge.
Best job role: information assistant or virtual secretary.
A few years from now we may be seeing US tariffs on these just like EVs today.
China is developing fast and it took US trade war seriously.
A couple generations don’t mean much anymore.
Performance gains have been slow.
I’d rather understand where exactly is its performance in comparison to AMD and Intel.
Then I can make a call if it is worth it.
After all there’s plenty of Raspberry Pi level performance and people are happy with it as long as price is right.
They don’t want Boeing even for free.
There’s so much incompetent advice here.
CPU is fine.
Linux is booting and tries to connect to TPM (trusted platform module).
It has nothing to do with graphics card. Fact it is booting means CPU is most likely likely unaffected.
TPM is most likely fried.
Linux can run without TPM. Plenty of old boards were shipped with TPM socket, but without TPM itself.
Best option is get manual for your motherboard and pull out that TPM.
Any passwords stored there are lost, if you used it.
If TPM is fine, then board pathway to it may be damaged. If that’s the case and you really need it, then board replacement is your option. But that’s only after good TPM was tried.
Jellyfin, i own my streaming
Only if there is such a huge vulnerability that they will have no choice.
That’s just my guess.
Promise of support is a tricky one.
I use Linux for home and Mac for work. My Mac is older Intel based with software bar for F keys. If in the past 10 years ago I was into Mac and owned one… I no longer see the reason for Mac.
Hardware choices are not a selling point
Context bar makes it harder to use for programming. It is not a sell for me.
Mouse pad frequently jumps cursor.
Keyboard feedback is cheap.
Software is not impressive either
Usability wise Gnome is better than OS X for me. No ctrl key on right side is terrible.
Due to Windows subsystem for Linux v2 I am starting to think Windows is better for Linux development than Mac.
MAC M1, M2 laptops have good battery life going for them.
They should make hardware people want to buy.
Hardware that’s worth the price.
Lately they failed on both counts and failed 1st means never had a chance at 2nd.
These comments are definitely reddit tier and that’s sad for the fediverse.
People don't change just because technology is different.
We always have to ask what language is it auto-completing for? If it is a strictly typed language, then existing tooling is already doing everything possible and I see no need for additional improvement. If it is non-strictly typed language, then I can see how it can get a little more helpful, but without knowledge of actual context I am not sure if it can get a lot more accurate.