Hugohase

joined 2 years ago
[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago

Yes for Sulfur derivates and nitrous oxigens but no for CO2. The biggest contributord to CO2 emissions are electricity production and traffic.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Its really easy to find this sources but I really dont know what you want to know. Maybe about being expensive? Slow?. There is literally tons of material out there... The other guy took the one thing that could maybe be argued about, CO2 emissions.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago

I only accept data that supports my worldview is a nice argument. Have fun not learning stuff.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sometimed I am astonished that people post in a forum without being able to comprehend text

We find that larger-scale national nuclear attachments do not tend to associate with significantly lower carbon emissions while renewables do.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

I think both. But either way, I am fine.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 61 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Nice example of a false equivalency...

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

AbEr eS kÖnNTe noCH wEniGer SeiN 🤓

view more: ‹ prev next ›