[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

We all thought Bill Gates was a megalomaniac, but clearly we didn't know shit

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Interesting, maybe the content has changed, I probably don't watch enough TV to have noticed. But I think Channel 4 news is pretty good, and I liked their Paralympics coverage.

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But then you could look at Channel 4, which does show ads to UK people, but I think Channel 4 is still okay and I don't think it has been ruined by ads. So maybe a profit motive is what causes enshittification, rather than just ads. I definitely hate ads but maybe ads alone don't destroy platforms.

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

True, they don't show commercial adverts in the UK, but they do to other countries. People outside the UK can access the BBC website but they'll see adverts on there, and apparently BBC America (shown in the US) has commercial adverts

And Channel 4 of course does show commercial adverts in the UK, but I think they still make some decent content, and I don't think they're on the verge of self-destruction

Maybe the real problem is when an entity is chasing profits, because Channel 4 isn't a normal for-profit business, since they're owned by the government, and I think they have to abide by some rules

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I don't think that's necessarily true - maybe it depends on (a) the owners of the platform and/or (b) whether there are sources of funding besides advertising

E.g. here in the UK, the BBC and Channel 4 are both broadcasters owned by the government, and both are funded at least in part by adverts. But I think both of them are relatively healthy and aren't on the brink of destroying themselves.

I think most of the BBC's funding comes from the licence fee (British people pay for a TV licence) but they make some money from ads shown to international audiences. Channel 4 is solely funded by adverts I think, but it's owned by the government and I think they have to abide by certain rules and targets.

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Same I think. Here in the UK the main two TV news channels (BBC and Sky) have extensively reported on deaths and suffering in Gaza, and now they are reporting on the situation in Lebanon

Of course there are also right-wing papers (Telegraph, Express) who give the impression that Israel is always good and everybody else is always bad, but they're just one segment of the overall media

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

People can release photos/videos all they want, but there are many people who suffer from cancer across the UK, yet we're told to care more about the royal family because they're rich and powerful

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

The Steam Deck seems like a decent console, if that counts, because you're free to do what you want with it

But perhaps you consider that to just be a handheld PC instead of a console, which I suppose is true

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

If someone has bought a Switch game legally, then it's legal to dump that game to a PC and play it on a Switch emulator, right?

Sure you could say that very few people dump their own games, but those that do are doing everything legally I think?

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

We all know that social media can encourage extremism in some people, but it's surprising when it happens to the richest guy in the world

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago

The funny part was when he said he was a free speech absolutist, but then he started restricting the free speech of people he doesn't like

1075

"Fidelity is currently valuing X at about $9.4 billion"

I found this funny.

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I just use Google with uBlock Origin to get rid of adverts

view more: next ›

GeneralInterest

joined 8 months ago