Ganbat

joined 1 year ago
[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bad Pedophile

As opposed to...

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago

I'm glad we agree that clowns are not human.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hint: the investment of $11 billion refers to investment of Gates Foundation in fossil fuels.

Well, considering these exact words were used:

That foundation owns over $11 billion in investments in the fossil fuel industry, including coal-burning utility companies.

What can I say but duh. If I misunderstood anything, it was the comment I replied to, which was unclear about the "0.05% down from 6%" detail, and seemed to be associating that with the $11 billion figure by context.

But hey, nice deflection, and super cool of you to be that rude about it, too.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

$11 billion

0.05%

"A small loan of a million dollars."

Does any of that matter in this situation, anyway? Exaggerating their content in exchange for money already places question on their reliability as an educational content creator.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I read it and I don't think it wasn't conflating them, I think it was just a simile. Granted, I think OP was wrong here and the simile didn't track because of it, but still, the ICE mentions could've been swapped with something entirely separate and the conversation would remain the same because it wasn't a direct comparison.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but those methods of verification weren't the subject of this breach, this was some manual bullshit done through Zendesk.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago

This greentext has so many layers it's shocking.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

I know it can't, I had to remove it from my toolkit because it can't. It's something to do with the colorspace added in 2.10. Now, when you export an image with an alpha channel, every other piece of software sees that alpha channel with much higher contrast. There's been a bug on the tracker for years, but the devs seem split between completely not understanding the issue and claiming it's intended behavior.

I've noticed something that isn't mentioned in the issue that pretty much proves it isn't intended, however. If you export a PNG with an alpha channel, then immediately reimport it to GIMP, the alpha channel will have the correct contrast, but will be completely crunched. Lost information. No way in hell destroying the alpha channel entirely is intended.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Welcome to the club. I was priced out of it a long time ago.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago

Damn, that's actually a really good joke.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

The shifting pronouns midway through threw me off for a while because I couldn't track how many characters were active in the scene. Basically, though, the lord is transfem. The farmer addresses her as female (and maybe compliments her chest, not sure). She thanks him, because she was boymoding (attempting to present as male because that's what's expected of her), but the farmer recognized her as female anyway. The farmer remains entirely unaware of what happened.

I don't know what a "piss levy" is.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Alright, yeah, that's fair, as long as those images don't have alpha components at least.

view more: ‹ prev next ›