Galle_

joined 2 days ago
[–] Galle_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Galle_@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago

No they haven't. Because they're set in Faerun.

[–] Galle_@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Faerun is garbage. Aggressively bad even for a medieval fantasy settings. No game set in Faerun can be good.

[–] Galle_@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's BECAUSE of the generic, boring medieval fantasy settings that they were successful.

[–] Galle_@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't believe you. That game exists, it's called Starfield, and it failed specifically because of its sci-fi setting and for no other reason.

[–] Galle_@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

We're talking about an article that considers Baldur's Gate 3 to be weird and ambitious. Words don't have meanings anymore.

[–] Galle_@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I find it bizarre that people think Starfield isn't "weird and ambitious". Starfield is absolutely weird and ambitious, that's why people didn't like it, it tried to do something new and that something new turned out to not be fun.

[–] Galle_@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago

Rogue Trader is actually good, but people who eat up medieval fantasy slop like BG3 will probably hate it.