EatATaco

joined 2 years ago
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah for me it's less that I rage about getting downvoted, its just when I see a massive number of downvotes for posts that are simply pointing to the facts, or being logical and rational...and they get a massive number of downvotes because it contradicts the circlejerk or what people want to be true.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I dont personally care about downvotes, but those data points sure do shake my faith in humanity sometimes.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

IMO, one of the best QoL updates for Lemmy is to make the votes invisible.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

It's a weird world and cool to think about. Thanks for the civil and interesting discussion.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m not the one being an asshole

Lol

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (9 children)

I'm not saying it's 99.9% of human intelligence, I'm saying you're describing 99.9% of human thought.

This is what humans do, we hear about something thing and then we learn how to apply it to another. You even mention here "stacking balls" and then making the connection that eggs are also round and would need to be stacked in the same way to prevent rolling. This is reasoning, using what you've learned and applying it to a novel problem.

What you are describing as novel problems are really just doing the same thing at a completely different level. Like I play soccer, but no matter how much I trained, there is no way I would ever reach Messi's skill, because he was just born with special skill in that area, but still just human like the rest of us.

And remember I'm mostly just pointing to the "text predictor" claim. I'm not convinced it's not, and I think that appeared true for early models, but not so easy to apply to current models.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (12 children)

If you need to make up what the other person said in order to make your point, and try to maintain it even after they've corrected you, it should lead you to realize how weak your position is.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Nope, but I know I have faith in my position, which you obviously don't have.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (14 children)

thinking I’m in favor of corruption

Except I don't think that, nor did I say anything that even remotely resembles this.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (16 children)

So what made you think I got you wrong...if you think I was right? This is making less sense as we go.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (18 children)

Nothing in your post indicates that my criticism of your point was wrong.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I've got a very good sense of humor, and even with the claim that it was a joke, it still doesn't make sense. Ya just missed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›