[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

The developer was threatened with legal action I last read so he was forced to takedown.

[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Surprise surprise!

[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I doubt it would have been discovered this fast and easily if it was closed source.

[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

Imagine if the governments were to fund open source projects when they need and as such the benefit is available to everyone if they have no money.

In such scenario all governments/citizens would have access to software that is good.

[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

One can never expect power of any kind to not be abused!

[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 52 points 8 months ago

In all honesty there was a period of time I thought all hope was lost but EU seems to be the last knight standing against these greedy mf.

We all have to bear in mind these lawmakers are fighting against enemies with near limitless resources so give credit where it is due and let's back them up as much as possible!

[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I'll take the trial sometime and see if I should drop the cents

[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Slowly but surely I am coming to the realisation that free services sooner or later will drift away from their privacy claims

136

In the last couple of months I have noticed an increasing trend of supplying me search results that are completely unrelated to the current query and tie back to my location or previous searches. I can say this with a high degree of certainty this is without a doubt beyond the 100th instance this has happened.

My browser is configured against tracking and fingerprinting (in fact all my devices are) which would make it fairly difficult to retain any data unless they are profiling me.

[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Ownership no longer has the same definition in the eyes of corporations and governments!

As concerning as that is, more so is the fact that the same infrastructure could be used for malicious intentions. That is ransomware level of control they reserve simply because they manufacture these devices.

84

Recently Motorola followed by Samsung started disabling/locking devices flagged as "illegal" through Mexico marking a precedent over the remote control manufacturers have over the devices they sell! Only after Mexican government made an official request to manufacturers they removed the lock.

Sources: https://linustechtips.com/topic/1537307-android-phones-disabled-remotly-in-mexico/ https://www.sammyfans.com/2023/10/23/samsung-stops-blocking-illegally-imported-galaxy-phones-in-mexico/

[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

You sir, understand the importance of allowing a child to go through their wrongs at the right time with the right guidance which is quite rare!

[-] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would avoid using an employer supplied device for personal use! More often than not these devices are "managed devices" which consists of management profiles that could grant all sorts of permissions from normal diagnostics, restrictions to location, camera and more!

With that said Apple in such case would become the middle man in relatio to the transaction! That means that Apple pay would retain the purchase logs on your card and ~~send a apple.com description to your bank~~ to mask all your purchases! In theory you'd be given more privacy in relation to your bank but you'd be introducing a third party in the process and more potential failure points!

view more: next ›

DetectiveSanity

joined 1 year ago