copium

based

Lol the amerikkkans are starting to realize the consequences of their actions

running in the background isnt a system tray. every other desktop on the face of the earth has a system tray. It's a basic espected feature and i use system tray functionality all the time.

cope

Its mostly the devs and the bad decisions they make around GNOME, for me i use a lot of apps that require Server Side Window Decorations (SSD) to be useful, specifically apps like Foot terminal (default gnome console or gnome terminal is not featureful enough and neither have sixel support, whereas foot terminal does have sixel) and gnome doesnt have any SSD on wayland, and GNOME also lacks customization features and doesnt have a standardized theming API and the GNOME devs consider themes to be "unsupported". Unlike on KDE Plasma where themes have a standardized API through the toolkit (qt) and are officiall supported. Also GNOME in general lacks basic features that require extensions whereas on other desktops you have things like a systray as a default.

you forgot the "/sar"

beliefs do make you a communist, are disabled people not communist because they are unable to physically organize? lmao

i know one such person like this myself, she's physically disabled but is still 100% communist even if she cant physically organize all that well.

now obviously this changes if you ARE able-bodied and able to stuff but simply choose not to, but my point still stands

someone who is truly a communist and also able-bodied will want to physically take action anyways

Marx was also materially bourgeois as he lived and fully depended (materially) on a bourgeois person (engels), as far as i know he didnt have a job and he was fully dependent on engels for everything.

theory is good but not entirely necessary lol, marxism is scientific not academic, you just need to know the basics and everything else is optional (but still good to know)

girls

Anyone can be a communist, all it takes is your want to destroy capitalism and the inequality and oppression it brings, coming from rich or poor means nothing, as you said many famous marxists, including marx himself, were materially bourgeois, but they didnt oppress the proletariat and were genuine revolutionaries who actually wanted to end the oppression of the proletariat, these people were class traitors to the bourgeoisie and aided the proletariat against their class interests, calling these people anything but socialist or communist is plainly absurd to be honest.

And this is coming from someone who regularly deals with food issues.