Colloidal

joined 1 week ago
[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

You have the link to the guy’s blog, go shout that at him.

He’s proposing the GPL instead of these licenses, not exactly selfish. I don’t think the issue is being useful. Is complaining After people used your license as per its terms.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Cuck+%E2%80%9Clicense%E2%80%9D

The web did.

But don’t let that stop you on your crusade to clean the web of foul words. I wish you all the best.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev -2 points 3 days ago (4 children)

In case you haven’t noticed, I didn’t coin the term.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago

Can they answer “not no”?

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

Pretty sure it’s a shock and awe strategy by the author to make the term stick. And it worked.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago

You’re the man/woman/person!

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Hold a sec. Rolling your own RDBMS out of a NoSQL database is insane. But is the opposite feasible? Wouldn't it be a simple table with two columns: a key and a JSON blob?

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Right, RDBMS for object permanence is a pain. It’s meant as efficient data storage and retrieval. But I counter that a huge amount of data problems are of that kind, and using object permanence for general database applications seems very contrived. I’m imagining loading a huge amount of data to memory to filter the things you need, essentially rolling your own DBMS. Am I missing something?

view more: ‹ prev next ›