Lookin good! I was just perusing the metadata and got a chuckle out of "wearing a light grey shaved smooth vagina."

I hope you're not saying "reverse engineer" like it's a negative or shady practice. I freely share all of my prompts to help people see what's working for me, and I like to explore what's working for everyone else. I've had good success with simpler prompts too, like the one for this parrot: https://civitai.com/images/3050333.

No controlnet or inpainting. Everything was generated in one go with a single prompt. I'll sometimes use regional prompts to set zones for head and torso (usually top 40% is where the head goes, bottom 60% for torso/outfit). But even when I have regional prompting turned off, it will still generate a 3/4 / cowboy shot.

I assume you pulled the prompt out of one of my images? If not, you can feed them into pngchunk.com. Here's the general format I use with regional prompting:

*scene setting stuff*
ADDCOMM
*head / hair description*
ADDROW
*torso/body/pose*

The loras that are in the top (common) section are weighted pretty low, 0.2 - 0.3, because they get repeated/multiplied in each of the two regional rows. So I think at the end they're effectively around 0.6 - 0.8.

photo of a young 21yo (Barbadian Barbados dark skin:1.2) woman confident pose, arms folded behind back, poised and assured outside (place cav_rdrguarma:1.1),
(Photograph with film grain, 8K, RAW DSLR photo, f1.2, shallow depth of field, 85mm lens),
masterwork, best quality, soft shadow
 (soft light, color grading:0.4)

ADDCOMM

sunset beach with ocean and mountains and cliff ruin in the background ,
(amethyst with violet undertones hair color in a curly layers style:1.2),
 perfect eyes, perfect skin, detailed skin

ADDROW

choker ,
(pea green whimsical unicorn print bikini set:1.1) (topless:1.3) cameltoe (undressing, panty pull:1.4) 
(flat breast, normal_nipples :1.4),
(tan lines, beauty marks:0.6)
(SkinHairDetail:0.8)
 

It may be that you're not describing the clothing / body enough? My outfit prompts are pretty detailed, so I think that goes a long way for Stable Diffusion to determine how to frame things.

Wow, this is great!

Here's the original pixel art from 1987, for the youngus amongus:

I've tried using less than 75 tokens (literally just "woman on beach wearing dress") and they weren't coming out much different stability wise than my 300+ token monstrosity prompts that lets me play OCD with fabric patterns and hair length and everything else. So I'm not sure why my experience differs so much from the conventional advice. I think the majority of the jumping is from the dynamic prompts. Here's one that didn't change the prompt per-frame (warning: hands!) and it's much more stable: https://files.catbox.moe/rgjbem.mp4. There's definitely a million knobs to fiddle with in these settings, and it's all changing every day anyway, so it's hard to keep up!

That's just the nature of Stable Diffusion. I didn't prompt anything about eye color, so the models fall back onto internal biases. On average blonde hair = blue eyes, and brown hair = brown eyes.

Hmm.... this should be a webm video. Works (sort of) on desktop, but not in my lemmy phone apps. Back to the drawing board.

Fair observation. I need to do more to overcome the biases in the models.

You can get a lot of interesting pose variety by messing with the aspect ratio. See also regional prompting to carve out spaces within the larger frame. I find putting head/hair/face prompts in their own region, then scaling that region, to be extremely effective in controlling close-up to wide shot framing.

⭐️ Red Dead Redemption 2. Specifically, the snowy town of Colter.

Gingers with asian facial features is messing with my brain. If thats what you're going for, great. But i found the negative embedding 'Style Asian Less' to be helpful in dialing the heavy asian over representation in the models back a bit.

Will be picking up that lifetime unlock just to keep my precious Tutti Frutti icon. 🤣

Congrats on the impending launch! I'm hoping you plan on a tip jar option as well, 'cause if you keep up this level of development, i'm going to feel guilty about the generous discount in a year.