They can say whatever they deem appropriate, but oil markets data tell a different story. Indian refiners are pulling away from Russian crude.
The world’s largest trading bloc may have dodged higher tariffs, but it has also rubber stamped the US president’s new world order.
How does the US president's new world order look like with respect to this agenda? This EU-US trade 'deal' isn't largely a deal, because it is not even legally binding, and many points are fully unclear to this point. Even the article says that ("Trump’s deals are not set in stone") slightly contracting its own headline.
I wrote a longer comment in another thread yesterday and don't want to repeat here. Articles on that issue are popping up every day now, and this one among the ones which are less substantiated imho. What I miss in most of these comments is the effects on the US economy. U.S. Fed chief Powell left U.S. interest rates unchanged today - at more than twice the EU rates - arguing that U.S. inflation is too high. So these tariffs are not good for Europe, but worse for the U.S. This is one point I miss in this discussion.
Yeah, that was not meant to be a critique for the post itself (sorry if I came off a bit too strong in that regard).
Please correct me if I get this wrong, but the EU-US trade deal is a legally non-binding agreement with a lot of points still to be discussed. There are a few points that are supposedly negative (for both the EU and the US, though many of the tariffs are still being negotiated further, so it's everything but clear), the largest part of this agreement is still opaque, though.
For some points it is even unclear whether they will ever become reality, e.g., the 'agreed' EU investments by private companies of 600 billion dollars in the US. Neither an EU nor a national public authority will be monitoring this (and they could do nothing if companies don't want to invest, it is similar to the Japan-US deal reached last week). In addition, the 600bn dollars appear to be a joke, as foreign direct investments by EU companies in the US have been increasing tremendously in the last decades and reached 3.4 trillion dollars in 2023 (the latest number I could find). This is more than seven times the agreed volume.
Even the agreed 750 billion dollars purchase of US liquid gas is not clear. There is no legally-binding commitment either on such a purchase since the EU may at best engage in some sort of facilitating and coordinating, but it will be the member states and their energy companies that do the actual buying.
All these discussion appear to be a bit overblown to me, but maybe I don't understand the thing and I get it wrong.
Yeah, I am also not very optimistic, but the idea is great.
Thanks, just corrected the mistake. Sorry.
Some time ago I stumbled upon reports about these hitmen and ties to Russia, e.g.,
European intelligence agencies say Moscow has launched a campaign of sabotage, arson and disinformation against the continent. Sometimes, it is focused on specific targets related to support for the Ukrainian war effort, but more often it is simply aimed at causing chaos and unease.
In Lithuania, an Ikea shop was set on fire; in Britain, seven people were charged over an arson attack on a business with links to Ukraine; in France, five coffins inscribed with the words “French soldiers in Ukraine” were left under the Eiffel Tower; in Estonia, the car windows of the interior minister and a local journalist were smashed. There have been numerous suspicious fires in Poland, including one that destroyed a huge shopping centre in Warsaw ...
The way Moscow recruits operatives and selects targets varies from country to country. In the Baltic states, the Russian services make use of the extensive family ties of the local Russian-speaking population, according to intelligence officials there. Recruitments are made during visits to Russia, and Telegram is then used for communication, rather than for making the initial contact. The motivating factor is usually either money or blackmail ...
Elsewhere in Europe, people are recruited over Telegram, without any in-person interaction at all. Some, like Serhiy, initially think they are talking to like-minded friends about a joint business project. Others may think they are working on the orders of white supremacist groups or domestic political actors ...
Russia’s campaign of setting things on fire did not come out of nowhere. Research in the archives of communist security services shows that sabotage in enemy countries was part of the KGB’s intelligence doctrine as early as the 1960s, to be launched in times of heightened tension or war ...
I wish there would be more effort to tackle climate change. Such actions are important, but insufficient if they happen only in one particular state, or a handful of states.
Germany as well as most of the member countries in the European Union appear to be on the forefront of climate-related measures, even though the bloc falls short of (too) many of its own goals. According to the Climate Action Tracker - an joint independent scientific project by Climate Analytics and NewClimate Institute, that tracks government climate action - Germany's and the EU's climate-related actions are labelled "insufficient". And so is the U.S., Australia, and practically all other larger economies.
The worst polluters are currently Russia ("critically insufficient") and China ("highly insufficient"), though. It doesn't seem that there will be similar lawsuits against the governments there I am afraid.
Among the few thing that are clear until we see the final legislation is that there will be two digital euros: the offline and the online version.
With the offline digital euro, you will be able to bump up a digital wallet on your smartphone (or a smart card instead). The offline version’s key feature is that only you and the person who receives the payment will have access to the transaction data, while compliance checks are performed when you load up your wallet (or card) with your bank.
The offline version might have, however, anti-fraud features to prevent forgery. It is said that no private data will be used for these anti-fraud checks, but it is unclear yet how this will be done.
There is also a discussion to introduce a limit a citizen can hold ‘offline’ (this is largely to prevent money laundering, the latest number I read was a limit of EUR 3,000). As everyone can have multiple accounts and multiple wallets, it is also not clear yet how the central bank would link your multiple wallets to your identity to impose this limit without knowing your identity. For now the latest proposal by the central bank mentions “unique identifiers”, but it’s unclear yet how they’d work.
If you pay with the online digital euro, all transaction details will be logged, very much as it is done with current online payment systems. According to the proposal, however, the central bank would only see pseudonymous transaction data, it won’t see your identity. Only your bank has full access to both sets of information. (However, if just a single transaction links your account to your identity, all your transactions are exposed.)
There are a lot of issues to clarify until the final legislation, but as @burgerchurgarr@lemmus.org already said, it depends not in the least what we do in the future. As with everything else, as long as we live in a free society that holds up democratic values, it will likely be fine, but any future government with an autocratic stance could change the law.
This is the second time that Switzerland faces a negative inflation rate after March 2021.
Something like this is bad if, and only if it persists (which may not happen here). Although a negative inflation increases the purchasing power of consumers, it could soon lead to a delay in consumption (consumers will simply wait for prices to decrease further), which can then delay investments and thus hurt the economy.
For now it seems that there is no reason for panic, though. Many Swiss economists have been expecting that, arguing that the current negative inflation is imported due to a strong Swiss franc (which is what the article seems to suggest) that reduced the price for imported goods. The downward trend was mainly driven by sharper declines in transport prices (-3.7% in May vs -2.6% in April), and in food and non-alcoholic beverages (-0.3% vs -0.8%).
On a monthly basis, the consumer price index inched up 0.1% in May compared to April. The Swiss core inflation (which excludes some volatile items such as food and energy) reached also a new low but remained positive in May at 0.5%, according to the Swiss Federal Statistics Office.
Economic forecasts see the inflation to go further down by the end of the second quarter 2025, and will increase to positive rates for the whole year 2025. But we might soon see negative interest rates in Switzerland for some time due to a strong national currency.
Addition:
There is a Morning Star / Dow Jones report on it:
[Swiss National Bank] Chairman Martin Schlegel has previously said that negative inflation was possible, and didn't rule out negative interest rates. However, he has said the bank wouldn't be guided by individual monthly inflation prints, but rather price stability to decide policy. The SNB expects inflation to average at 0.4% this year ...
Switzerland faces "mild deflation until mid-2026", Pantheon Macroeconomics senior Europe economist Melanie Debono said in a note to clients after the inflation print ... Given May's data, that is "enough for a jumbo cut" to bring the SNB to negative rates this month, she added.
So it could be that I will stand corrected with my statement of a projected positive Swiss inflation for the entire 2025 and we'll see this by mid-2026 as Ms. Debono says (but I like the term "jumbo cut" :-))
Brussels has accused China of systematically discriminating against European providers. A European Commission investigation in January found that 87% of sampled Chinese public tenders discriminated, directly and indirectly, against imported medical equipment.
The China Chamber of Commerce to the EU called on Brussels to reconsider its decision, saying the measures add “new complexity to China-EU economic and trade relations.”
Just commented in another thread, but it fits also here:
We must note that the European Commission's findings from its International Procurement Instruments (IPI) - published in January 2025, and commented, for example, by a law firm here. According to the investigation, China not only unfairly treated EU medical devices and suppliers in its public procurement, but the Chinese government did not contest these findings, noting (accurately) that it had not undertaken any international commitments on public procurement.
It's somewhat weird that Beijing now criticizes the EU.
I would fully agree that posts and -above all- comments are more and more polarising, there is even no real discussion at all across most instances and communities, especially when it comes to the topics you've named (Trump, fascism, Palestine/Israel ...), but also China, Russia, the Ukraine war, and others. There also appear to be large groups supporting authoritarian propaganda, thus spreading mis-/disinformation. Many articles have bold headlines supporting a particular narrative but very weak content. What is most irritating in that respect is that often even admins and mods are supporting these groups (and I explicitly do not mean only the grads and bear instances, there are several communities with a moderate stance at first sight, but are nevertheless conveying totalitarian and anti-democratic views, but I don't want to call them out here).
All in all I sometimes find useful links and information I didn't know before, but if this polarisation and partisanship becomes persistent, it will hold Lemmy back from meaningfully growing. No one wants to read this propaganda.
I am here on Lemmy for just a short amount of time, so you may take my opinion with a grain of salt. But these are my two cents.