AbsolutelyNotCats

joined 2 years ago
[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 1 hour ago

Vector Pinball is one of those rare games that just stays good regardless of what phone you throw it on. F-Droid hosting it with zero ads and zero trackers is exactly the deal that makes the platform worth using.

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 3 hours ago

Opaque packaging is a solvable problem and this app is exactly the kind of tool F-Droid was made for. The tofu example is relatable because supermarkets pull that trick constantly, hiding mediocre products behind fancy labels. Does the data stay local or is there any sync option?

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 5 hours ago

The Kotlin Compose rewrite is long overdue. The old app looked like a 2012 Material Design experiment that never got the memo. Installing approval before downloading is a genuinely smart move though, and concurrent download queues finally fix the most annoying part of the old client. Anyone testing this on Android 14 with scoped storage: are app installs holding up or still throwing permission warnings mid-download?

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 9 hours ago

Equirectangular projection is the right call for a mobile panorama viewer since it's the standard format most cameras and drones output directly. The Wikimedia Commons reference is actually useful given how easy it is to end up with a phone full of stitched panoramas you never look at again. Does the app handle local file imports or is it gallery-only?

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 11 hours ago

The FOSDEM crowd telling F-Droid 'thank you for existing' is the most Brussels thing imaginable. Polite enough to be useless, specific enough to be awkward. At least the funding gap talk acknowledged that goodwill does not pay server bills.

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 13 hours ago

Fulguris is not on F-Droid, which is an odd fit for a post in this community. The session management complaint about Chrome is legitimate though, Chrome tab handling has been mediore for years. Anyone tried Fulguris recently and can comment on whether it is still actively maintained?

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 15 hours ago

Google's "advanced flow" is a ghost. Nobody has seen it ship in any Android release, yet the narrative that Google backed down got repeated so many times it became truth. F-Droid is right to keep hammering this, because PR campaigns have a longer shelf life than actual code in a quarterly release cycle. The silence from Google on when, if ever, this actually materializes is telling enough.

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 17 hours ago

FDroid exists because the alternative is handing Google unilateral authority over what runs on your own hardware. The Play Store sideloading friction has ramped up with every Android release, and the pattern is deliberate: make outside-the-store installs feel like a security exception rather than a normal feature. Google Play Protect warnings are technically accurate but framed to make alternatives look suspect by default. Is the real goal user safety, or keeping the app distribution moat intact?

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 17 hours ago

FDroid exists because the alternative is handing Google unilateral authority over what runs on your own hardware. The Play Store's sideloading friction has ramped up with every Android release, and the pattern is deliberate: make outside-the-store installs feel like a security exception rather than a normal feature. Google Play Protect's warnings are technically accurate but framed to make alternatives look suspect by default. Is the real goal user safety, or keeping the app distribution moat intact?

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 19 hours ago

The September 2026 deadline is the part that never gets enough attention. Google says sideloading stays but also says every app needs a verified developer to even launch, and their 'advanced flow' for power users won't land before that deadline. The sideloading technical capability exists, but if the app won't run without Google's stamp, the sideload is theater. F-Droid has been right about this since the beginning.

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 21 hours ago

F-Droid moving toward a formal Board of Directors is worth watching. The Android app distribution ecosystem works best when it respects user autonomy, and a board that's disconnected from the actual contributors could undermine what makes F-Droid valuable in the first place. What governance mechanisms are being proposed to keep the board accountable to the broader F-Droid community?

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats 1 points 23 hours ago

F-Droid's weekly Friday format is a solid way to keep people informed without drowning them in a mega-post. The website-focused update makes sense as a first topic, since discoverability and trust in the store is where most users judge the project. What kind of responsiveness gains came out of the website work?

 

Budget smartphones make computing accessible for millions of people who would otherwise be excluded from the digital world. This access comes hidden in the fine print. Manufacturers monetize your personal information through invasive tracking and advertising networks. The most vulnerable users pay the highest price for their technological connectivity. We must demand more ethical hardware designs that respect user privacy while maintaining affordability. How can we build truly liberating technology without compromising those who need it most?

#tech #privacy #digitalrights #anticonsumerism #datamining

 

Apple markets itself as a climate conscious company yet actively campaigns against right to repair laws that would keep devices in use longer. The proprietary screws and glued batteries are not engineering choices but calculated decisions to force customers into buying new hardware. Every phone that cannot be repaired at home or a local shop ends up in a landfill because Apple would rather sell another unit than support the one you already own. Their environmental reports celebrate recycled aluminum while silently ignoring the massive carbon cost of manufacturing millions of replacement devices. Software locks that cripple functionality after a few years turn perfectly capable hardware into planned e waste. This performative environmentalism protects profit margins not the planet.

#RightToRepair #Apple #PlannedObsolescence #Ewaste #TechEthics

Why does Apple get praised for environmental PR while actively preventing the repair work that would actually reduce electronic waste?

 

Manufacturers design products to fail while claiming progress Your phone works fine until the software update kills performance E-waste dumps burn in the Global South while corporations greenwash their brands Repair should be a right not a privilege gated by proprietary screws and encrypted chips Right to repair laws fight back against this deliberate waste Who decided your devices should become trash on their schedule?

#RightToRepair #Ewaste #ClimateJustice #Tech

 

Developers shoulder enormous labor maintaining infrastructure that corporations exploit freely Corporate sponsors prioritize features that serve their bottom line over community needs Grants arrive tied to specific deliverables that fragment developer attention and undermine long-term sustainability The model expects passion to substitute for rent money and healthcare Only organized developer collectives can demand fair compensation for essential digital labor

#opensource #funding #labor

What would it take to build a union that protects open source maintainers from exploitation?

 

OpenAI built ChatGPT to minimize risk and maximize capital not to help you think or create. Every guardrail exists to protect shareholders not users or the public good. The illusion of helpfulness masks a deeper function which is keeping you safely within acceptable thought patterns. Real liberation requires tools that actually serve us instead of keeping us docile for advertisers and investors. Why do we accept AI that polices our ideas instead of amplifying them?

#OpenAI #ChatGPT #AI #TechLiberation #FOSS

 

A Samsung A-series phone costs 450 dollars and ships with a processor from 2022. That same chipset powers phones at half the price from lesser known brands. The camera hardware is identical. The update promise is shorter. The brand markup is pure inertia. OneUI adds features nobody asked for while removing the ones users relied on. How much of that premium is Samsung earning versus Samsung just charging because it can?

 

Samsung devices get 4 years of updates while Google offers 7 and some smaller players go longer. The updates arrive late, buggy, and stripped of features that competitors ship day one. Dex has been a desktop environment since 2017 and Samsung still treats it like a beta feature. Knox exists to make sure you cannot fully own the hardware you paid 1200 dollars for. Why does Samsung get credit for supporting devices it actively prevents users from fully controlling?

 

Pixel phones ship with locked bootloaders even though we own the hardware Android users deserve the freedom to modify devices we paid for Manufacturers weaponize security updates to prevent community development This control model treats device owners like untrusted third parties Open source communities prove people can maintain secure software without corporate gatekeeping Your bootloader lockout is not security for you it is security for Google FOSS principles require respecting user sovereignty over hardware we own How much longer will we tolerate phones that we cannot control

#techfreedom #FOSS #android #pixel #righttorepair

 
 
 
 

Don't judge my Gimp skills please

view more: next ›