I disagree, things eat each other. It's just an exchange of resources. What matters is intent, process, and waste. I an fine with eating animals that were raised in non-cruel conditions(which is also a food safety issue), killed humanely, and all parts are utilized.
Also like, if some animal gets the drop on me and returns the favor, them so be it, good on them,
Ah, because they support the wrong genocide eh? You really shouldn't bother tankie, it ain't worth it ;)
Well yeah, he was running around north Norwich with his found family for a while fighting vampires and other supernatural baddies
What are you trying to say? People only grow food because of a financial incentive? We know that isnt true because agriculture is older than any monetary economic system. Money simply acts as a means of smoothing out larger trade volumes, you don't even need it for basic local trade.
Capitalism isn't even the only market system, so that doesn't really work either.
Capitalism is definitially a cancerous socioeconomic system. Prioritizing infinite growth in a finite system above all else inevitably causes systemic collapse on a long enough timeframe. Not to mention capitalism cannot hand the Matthew principle, aka power/money attracts power/money. Again, on a long enough timeframe inevitable leads to wealth disparities that collapse the system and society trying them.
The logic is plainly right there, staring us in the face that this cannot go on forever.
Until it's bad enough that the poors decide they have had it with the owner class,
Yeah, but there is also academically knowing something vs actually seeing it. I doubt those people's minds would be blown away, but theyd probably find it rather sick to experience.
When does it become easier to just write the thing yourself?