this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
104 points (94.1% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4681 readers
2 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 55 points 1 year ago

Would be interesting to see 1800 controlled for child mortality.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is less interesting than standard deviation, percentage living to 50/60/70/80, or life expectancy for men/women and at 1/5/18 years old though, as the issue here is it's hard to tell what is from things like dying in childbirth for both the child & mother and dying as a young child, vs being able to live longer, as we know people have lived well into their 80s and 90s since records began (ie Ancient Greece/Egypt/Sumeria) but this data implies that everyone used to die at 30, when in reality there were likely 2 peaks at 0-5 and 60-80

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this data implies that everyone used to die at 30

No, it doesn't. Unless you don't know what life expectancy means.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Life expectancy is how long you can expect to live from birth. It being 30 implies that you can expect to live 30 years, however in fact you'd most likely live <5 or >50 years

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is Australia doing so good? Half the things there are trying to kill you!

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

How is the US doing so good? Half the population there is trying to shoot you!

How is the UK doing so good? Half the cooks there are trying to poison you!

/j

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The change from 1800 to 1950 is mostly caused by soap, and the change from 1950 to 2015 by penicilline and the Haber process.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not even. The biggest change is due to crazy high infant mortality rates no longer drastically reducing the average

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, and what caused the reduction in infant mortality?

Soap. Or rather the revolutionary idea that it would be good if doctors and midwives used it.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Which was largely due to the introduction of soap and hygiene practices during childbirth.

[–] 10MeterFeldweg@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Do not forget vaccines.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is Canada doing better than the US?

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Single-payer healthcare not tied to employment?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

In 2015, single payer healthcare

Today, infant and maternal mortality

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago
  1. Monaco 90 years
  2. Loma Linda 88 years