this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
121 points (97.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43899 readers
827 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] angelsomething@lemmy.one 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

We gave our kid their first proper smartphone when they had to do a bit of travel to get to school. However, I've fully embraced the parental controls of Google family link and Microsoft safety and it's been great so far. The combination of both provides incredibly granular controls to what they can see on the web, how long they use specific apps and what apps they're allowed to install.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've got complaints about Google family link's limits. They don't work right.

This is on the family tablet.

As for phones, my kid will get a phone sometime after they ask for one, likely when I upgrade mine. (Unless it's a forced upgrade due to gravity or water)

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What’s wrong with the screenshot? I have no idea what the numbers mean but I’d guess 28min is how long the app was opened, and 20m is how much video was watched?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh, yeah, it's set for a 20 minute limit, it was used for 28. Limits are supposed to be uh, limiting.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Oh, yeah. So one’s the limit, the other the actual? Yikes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Four kids, smartphone distribution from top to bottom was about 15, 14, 14, 12. It was all of course dependent on the age of the kid and the ability to cope with the immense wealth of bullshit you get from having a smartphone.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My kids are still too young (not even 5 yet) but we’ve decided it’ll be largely up to their peers. They won’t be first, but we aren’t setting up an arbitrary age. We have been working on their relationship with screens and we just have to hope we do a good enough job. Once they have them we’ll undoubtedly limit the hours per day/week and I’ll put some restrictions on what they can do with them, but they’re always used to “daddy tv” (my server) so I’m less worried about the specifics and more focused on keeping the relationship healthy and transparent with us.

Edit: that second phone concept someone talked about here is excellent. I might borrow that.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Saw this in the news in my country just recently. Like, middle school would be appropriate, with property parental controls. I think that is what was said.

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee -3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

As a non parent of Lemmy I would give my fake daughter a clay tablet at the age of 13

You know if my fake kids were ever to remark that I was abusive I would like it to be because of not buying them phone. Id love to be a fly on the wall of that therapy session

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›