1
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by activistPnk@slrpnk.net to c/anticonsumption@slrpnk.net

I think it was the prime minister (or spokesperson) who made this very clever argument: (paraphrasing) “we are not taking away choice… cigarettes are designed to inherently take away your choice by trapping you in an addiction.”

I’m not picking sides here, just pointing out a great piece of rhetoric to spin the policy as taking away something that takes away your choice. Effectively putting forward the idea that you don’t have choice to begin with.

(sorry to say this rhetoric was not mentioned in the linked article; I just heard it on BBC World Service)

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JillyB@beehaw.org 0 points 6 months ago

Didn't New Zealand try this and eventually walk it back?

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago

A different government came in and cancelled it to fund tax cuts

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Anticonsumption

235 readers
5 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS