this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
937 points (98.2% liked)

World News

33103 readers
610 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] False@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] lauha@lemmy.one 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ho_Chi_Chungus@hexbear.net 53 points 11 months ago (1 children)

the little "world tension" meter in HOI4 just went up by like 3%

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SevenOfWine@startrek.website 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago (6 children)

startrek website continuing to be the highest quality instance

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (11 children)

NATO still trying to finish what the nazis started.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It was a de facto member as long as NATO existed. Now it also is a de jure member too, a big nothing-burger.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

NATO membership comes with guarantees and responsibilities.

The guarantee is that if Sweden would be attacked, other members will support with their troops. The responsibility is that Sweden must expand their military.

[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 11 months ago (7 children)

The former won't happen. Sweden is sorrounded by friendly countries. The second is a downside for Sweden.

So globally it is a nothing burger and locally it is a negative development for Sweden.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Guys will see this and say "hell yea"

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 25 points 11 months ago
[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 18 points 11 months ago (7 children)

I don't like the expansion of NATO, but due to Russia's recent imperialism, Sweden's and Finland's reactions are completely reasonable. A much healthier alternative would have been actually advancing towards an integrated European defense system involving EU members, with a door open to certain neighbours such as Norway, but it's pretty hard to do that when the political groups that could actually promote that alternative are schizophrenically tolerating positions such as "I'm a pacifist, so I'm advocating for my own country's disarmament despite my neighbours starting wars very recently" and "if Ukraine didn't want to get invaded, they shouldn't have sought guarantees against Russian aggression from third countries".

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Fuck the tankies in here and praise UN and Sweden.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Russia locked out of the Balkan Sea now?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The Balkan wars were tough on Sweden, being so geographically close to the conflict.

[–] o_d@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

NATO coming for the Baltic peninsula next

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago

Swedes still dream about dominium maris baltici

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SexMachineStalin@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago
[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 11 months ago (10 children)

Huzzah! Welcome to the team, Sweden. We can all be self defense buddies together! =D

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›