I think it's more the rejection of any sliver of risk by the studios that is killing originals.
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
16 points (80.8% liked)
[moved to piefed] movies
4272 readers
1 users here now
Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org
Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.
A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome
- Discussion threads to discuss about a specific movie or show
- Weekly threads: what have you been watching lately?
- Trailers
- Posters
- Retrospectives
- Should I watch?
Related communities:
- !television@lemm.ee
- !animation@lemm.ee
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !horrormovies@lemm.ee
- !martialartsmovies@lemm.ee
Show communities:
Discussion communities:
RULES
Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.
Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the titleβs subject matter.
Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.
2024 discussion threads
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
American psycho is one of the films that need no remake no one i mean no one could reproduce the character prescence dafoe and bale had on it . Some things are just perfect leave em alone.
Porque no los dos
American Psycho was perfect the first time. Leave it alone.
A rare example of a movie being better than its book.
American Psycho needs to be remade, if only because it'll shut up all the people who keep saying "You couldn't make something like that now!"
A new American Psycho could be fun I suppose. But I'd rather see them remake the not so good ones. The Canyons, woof. Or Rules of Attraction coulda been better.