15
submitted 7 months ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"Tory blames scapegoat for problem his party inflamed."

[-] martini1992@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

I wonder where he expected the shortfall to come from when he cut council budgets...

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Council leaders looking to raise tax by more than the 5% cap either have to be granted permission from central government or hold a local referendum on doing so.

Bedfordshire is the only council ever to have held such a referendum, holding a vote in 2015 in which local people rejected the idea of higher tax rates.

This week the government granted permission to a series of councils to raise taxes by more than the 5% cap, including Thurrock, Woking, Slough and Birmingham.

The prime minister added: “We can strike the balance between councils raising the money they need, but making sure they don’t unnecessarily burden people.”

Eight English councils, including Birmingham, Nottingham and Croydon, have issued so-called section 114 notices in recent years, in effect declaring themselves bankrupt.

But some Tory officials are concerned that could counteract the effect of national tax cuts that have been promised in next month’s budget by the chancellor, Jeremy Hunt.


The original article contains 474 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3015 readers
97 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS