this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2026
57 points (96.7% liked)

Out of the loop

15665 readers
114 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This was the top post when I checked Lemmy this morning.. Mod commented to mark the post NSFW, even though it wasn't NSFW as far as I could tell. Post was locked and had a ton of deleted comments.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

Less mods, more rockers.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

Mod's keeping that shit for the book.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Mod requested that OP mark the post as NSFW for including the "r" word.

OP refused and it went down hill from there.

[–] orbital@infosec.pub 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MapleFantastic5738@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Shhhh! You wanna get us all kicked out?!

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

Ridonkulous

[–] gastroglizzy@piefed.social 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Check the mod log.

Six hours ago, a mod cleaned house, deleting a bunch of comments, giving the reason "inflammatory needling all the way down". As to what "inflammatory needling" means, I have no idea.

Maybe they were arguing about some shit coin or China? Either way, not worth your and my time. We have shit to do today.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

Thanks, looks like the mod got in an argument with people about the word "retarded" being a slur, locked the post and deleted all their comments.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is mod abuse of power.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Block the mod.

[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

Just another tuesday.

[–] WongKaKui@piefed.ca 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Damn, this guy got banned 10 times!

[–] WongKaKui@piefed.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

"Holy shit dude you killed him"

"uh dude, stop shooting, he'd already dead 100 times"

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thanks, looks like the mod got in an argument with people about the word "retarded" being a slur, locked the post and deleted all their comments.

[–] Arcadeep@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, that's just [mod removed comment]

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I always found the "slur" argument to be stupid, by definition every insult is a slur.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The issue is that "retarded" is considered an ableist slur though, like the n-word is a racist slur.

Tap for overthinking tangential thoughtsWhile the Merriam Webster lists slur and insults as synonyms, I observe slur to be used describing insults based on a terminology degrading other people than the target of the insult by using a derogatory term towards these people as an insult. So retard would be a slur (and an insult) while asshole would be an insult without being a slur.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You also run into the euphemism treadmill.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Idiot - retarded - mentally disabled - differently abled

People use medicalized language to get at people. This causes words like idiot to become an insult.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, that's why "retard" especially is considered an ableist slur. I don't see the "euphemism treadmill" though.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Cycling out the old words because they are starting to feel slur-like, just to use the new medical language to harm/insult people.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for the explanation. But since I only said using the term "retard" as a slur (and made a tangent about the definition of "slur") and made no statement about other medical terms being used as slurs, I still fail to see what my initial comment has to do with the treadmill...

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Retard being used as a slur and something you cannot say to retarded people is what they perceived as the treadmill in action. This line of reasoning only works if and only if they vehemently stand against people using retard as a slur.

I don't know if they have any merit.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It has no merit unless you want to change nothing to prevent the treadmill. This is basically "let them use that slur or they will use a new slur" and that's just not achieving anything.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 8 hours ago

You're right. They appear to be an idiot.

Don't use medical terms/states as slurs is my opinion but they say all slurs are equal.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You haven't seen 'autistic' used as an insult? That's the newest entry on the treadmill.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No, I haven't. But how is that relevant to my comments?

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I was explaining how euphemism treadmill works.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

No, you weren't. Brought a new example.

And I still don't know how the euphemism treadmill is relevant to my comment.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz -4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Nope. I asked you, because you brought it up in a discussion. Don't be an impolite, self-disqualifying jerk, please.

[–] the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

The euphemism treadmill, as far as I understand, goes like this;

  1. Science comes up with a term for something or some one.
  2. People start to use that term as a slur.
  3. Science comes up with a new term because the old term has been tainted.
  4. People add the new term to the list of slurs. 3 Science faithfully obliges by thinking up a new term. Surely, no one will turn this into a slur!
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 hours ago

Oh boy, have I got news for you, 'jerk' is an ableist slur akin to 'spaz'.

jerk(n.1)

1550s, "stroke of a whip," from jerk (v.1). Sense of "sudden sharp pull or twist" is by 1570s. Meaning "involuntary spasmodic movement of limbs or features" recorded from 1805.
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

And yet you were rude to others trying to help you out by giving their understanding of the term, guess we are all impolite, jerks here.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz -5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

And the places that claim to be anti-slur are actually only against some of them. I have yet to see ban "hick" or "hillbilly" or "nazi" or "pagan". The metaphor filled english language is filled with slurs.

[–] mako@lemmy.today 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Nazi and pagan aren't slurs. People self-identify as both due to accepting their ideologies.

You might be confused because people say "nazi" as if it were a slur due to nazis being reprehensible.

Pagans are alright though.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Pagan started as slur for non-catholics. And saying Nazi isnt a slur because there are real nazis makes no sense. All slurs refer to real demographics of people.

[–] mako@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Pagans are referenced in the bible, long before Catholics existed. Don't say nonsense.

Do you think that Catholic is a slur? Is any descriptive word that someone might not agree with also a slur?

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Do, do you think the bible was written in English? https://www.etymonline.com/word/pagan

And yes, Catholic has been used in a derogatory manner. Though shorter more catchy slurs for catholics where made up along the way too.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com -2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

The fact that you spelled one out and not the other means there is clearly one of them that's worse.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 22 hours ago

And that is not an argument I made.

[–] whalesnrainbows@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

“[SLUR A] is a slur” and “[SLUR B] is worse than [SLUR A]” are two separate conversations.

[–] canttakeitwithyou@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's because you're not thinking about everyone else. The question is what message you're sending to the listeners.

If you choose a word (like "retard") which is discriminatory, you're showing your hate for the minority group, and not just for the other person. And that has an effect on the community at large. Maybe they don't want to be surrounded by bigots. Maybe they think that's shit.

So, if you're gonna have a flame war, pick negative and non-discriminatory words like "jerk" or "fuckface". Or don't, and get banned or blocked, if the mod feels like it. Either way.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 hours ago

Mother fucker is discriminatory to the incestuous. Son of a bitch is discriminatory to people with shitty mothers.