this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2026
6 points (100.0% liked)

Friendly Carnivore

109 readers
20 users here now

Carnivore

The ultimate, zero carb, elimination diet

Meat Heals.

We are focused on health and lifestyle while trying to eat zero carb bioavailable foods.

Keep being AWESOME

We welcome engaged, polite, and logical debates and questions of any type


Purpose

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you
  6. No LLM generated posts . Don't represent machine output as your own, and don't use machines to burn human response time.

Other terms: LCHF Carnivore, Keto Carnivore, Ketogenic Carnivore, Low Carb Carnivore, Zero Carb Carnivore, Animal Based Diet, Animal Sourced Foods


Meta

Carnivore Resource List

If you need to block this community and the UI won't let you, go to settings -> blocks you can add it.

[Meta] Moderation Policy for Niche Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The video attempts to graphically illustrate why ruminants are not to be blamed for climate change. Different arguments are shown regarding the differences between emissions from biogenic methane from ruminants and fossil fuel CO2, differences in production systems and the uncertainties regarding N2O emissions and the baseline of reference to compare emissions from ruminants compared with other activities.

generated summary

Greenhouse gases and the carbon cycle

  • Livestock contributes approximately 14% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions; agriculture emits mainly biogenic methane and nitrous oxide, while industry and transport release fossil CO2. [1]
  • Combustion of coal and oil releases CO2 from geological carbon stocks, which remains in the atmosphere for centuries and raises its CO2 concentration. [2]
  • Ruminant methane is oxidized to CO2 within approximately a decade, and plants take up this CO2 during photosynthesis to support renewed grass growth. [2]
  • At stable ruminant numbers, atmospheric methane inputs and removal can balance, whereas 100% of industry and transport emissions add new CO2 from fossil carbon stocks. [2]
  • In the bathtub analogy, atmospheric CO2 is the water, emissions the inflow, and limited natural removal the drain; industrialization increased inflow beyond removal and raised CO2 concentrations and global temperatures.
  • Atmospheric CO2 stabilization requires reduced fossil-carbon inflow, renewable energy adoption, and lower energy consumption.

European sheep and goats

  • Constant ruminant numbers correspond to balanced methane inflow and removal; methane emissions from European sheep and goats have declined by approximately 3% annually since 1990. [3]
  • The Oxford warming-linked emissions metric yields no additional warming from the declining methane emissions of European sheep and goats. [4]
  • Continued constant methane emissions would stabilize their warming impact, while a 1% annual reduction in sheep methane through 2050 would cause faster cooling. [4]
  • Similar proportional reductions in fossil CO2 emissions would still produce substantial warming because CO2 accumulates. [2][4]

Nitrous oxide and revised estimates

  • Nitrous oxide has an atmospheric lifetime exceeding 100 years, and one tonne is equivalent to 265 tonnes of CO2.
  • The IPCC Climate Change and Land assessment attributes over half of agricultural nitrous oxide emissions to livestock on managed pastures and rangelands. [5]
  • The default factors in the 2006 IPCC guidelines yielded overestimates of nitrous oxide emissions from grazing and manure application. [6]
  • Emission factors in the 2019 IPCC refinement are no more than half the earlier values for these sources. [7]

Grass-fed livestock, feedlots, and mitigation

  • Many people support removing ruminant livestock to address global warming, although grass-fed systems occupy biodiverse grasslands with low fossil-fuel requirements.
  • Diets containing more grass and fibre generate more methane.
  • Domestic grazing livestock occupy the historical niche of wild grassland herbivores; their removal would allow wild herbivores to occupy that niche and produce comparable methane emissions, as in the past. [8]
  • Preserving livestock production without grass-fed systems would require additional feed-crop cultivation.
  • Under that replacement scenario, feedlot livestock would generate less methane but more than twice the fossil-fuel use and nitrous oxide emissions because of fertilizer inputs and dense livestock populations, together with land conversion and biodiversity loss.
  • Methane reductions accompanied by increased fossil-fuel consumption provide little near-term benefit and a worse longer-term outcome; mitigation centers on fossil-fuel reduction and low-fuel food production.

References

  1. [00:06] Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities (FAO, 2013) — https://www.fao.org/4/i3437e/i3437e00.htm
  2. [00:28] Losing Time, Not Buying Time (Pierrehumbert, 2010) — https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/12/losing-time-not-buying-time/
  3. [02:08] Del Prado et al., iSAGE Deliverable 4.4: New Trajectories Towards Innovative Sheep and Goat Production Systems — https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?appId=PPGMS&documentIds=080166e5cc083f12
  4. [02:17] Improved Calculation of Warming-Equivalent Emissions for Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (Cain et al., 2019) — https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0086-4
  5. [03:00] Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report (IPCC, 2019) — https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988
  6. [03:16] 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use — https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4
  7. [03:21] 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories — https://www.ipcc-tfi.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/index.html
  8. [04:02] Intensifying Pastoralism May Not Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Wildlife-Dominated Landscape Scenarios as a Baseline in Life Cycle Analysis (Manzano and White, 2019) — https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01555
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 3 days ago

We tried articles, we tried papers, we tried thought experiments, now let's try a animated video!