this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2026
97 points (94.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

50562 readers
700 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First things first, I don't doubt it is a bad thing, considering who supports it and who doesn't.

But my question is what exactly is the issue and what is the current and proposed voting process when it comes to IDs?

Here in my EU country, you have to show some version of a government ID, be it an ID card, drivers license or passport. And we don't have to pre-register to vote.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You have to understand the roots of the voting registration rules here to understand it better. The whole point of them was to keep black men and all women from having a vote.

That's it - that is what they were for. So every permutation since is built on that framework, it's always "the wrong people might vote' instead of "we want to make sure everyone votes".

So voter ID is not a bad idea on its face, you go in to vote the poll workers need to know who you are, right? The lady who sits across from me at work is old, she went to renew her driver's license in February this year and they said no, your current license (that they issued) is not enough, there are new requirements - we need your birth certificate, your first marriage license, your divorce paperwork, your second marriage license, your divorce decree from that marriage, then we can renew your license.

She just managed to get all this by mid-October, so she did get through in time to vote but what the fuck? She had to reach out to 3 states and getting a birth certificate from like the 1950s is not easy. Why is it not easy to renew? Because the laws were written to prevent voting not to enable it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Toga77@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (21 children)

You LITERALLY cannot register to vote without already being a fucking citizen.

The ID thing is a complete non issue bullshit smoke screen to disenfranchise voters.

Not yelling at you at all, but this issue makes my blood boil.

[–] Tradwench@thelemmy.club 6 points 6 days ago

It's not in a vacuumm, but when you look at the material conditions in the US, the way it is argued to happen is really for one reason only: voter suppression. I always said if anyone was arguing for it in good faith, they would set in motion a multiple-year program with a dedicated agency that's sole goal is to make sure every eligible voter has an ID first, and then make it a requirement. The way things are, many eligible voter have been kept from aquiring IDs via various historical and beuracratic systems.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Before you can vote, you have to "register" to vote. When you do this, you need to prove you're a U.S. citizen. Usually providing a birth certificate, or passport, military id, idk everything.

My understanding was that the name you were registering to vote with had to match the document you were using. But if you got married then often times the women would have a different last name and now it doesn't match your birth certificate. Normally you'd just have to prove you got married too but this new law would say no, you have to have the exact name or you can't vote.

Since women typically take the man's last name, it would effectively mean any married women registering to vote would not be allowed. And since the bill is worded confusingly on purpose, many women would not even realize this until they went to register to vote, and told they couldn't because of their new last name.

[–] josephc@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

Additionally, minorities and underprivileged folks don't often have the means to get drivers licenses. How do you take the exam if you don't have a car to practice? Or can't get the time off work to go to the DMV for a government ID? It might not be the stated intent of the law, but the few places it's been implemented have seen drastic reductions in the incident rate of black and Latino voters.

[–] Duhtocqueville@ttrpg.network 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It’s not effectively any woman, it’s a women who is using their birth certificate for ID. Which is effectively 1/3 of the options so it’s significant but not “effectively mean any married woman can’t vote.”

They can use a passport, state issued ID such as Drivers license or ID card or a birth certificate. The new drivers licenses and IDs that are “real IDs” which is required now are also proof of citizenship.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That's fair, I should've been more exact with my words. If someone is poor and living in a large metro area they might not even have a drivers license so birth certificate would be their best option. And large metro areas typically swing democrat so it would disproportionately hurts dems more than cons.

Not an llm but wanted to acknowledge good criticism.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Here's my perspective from other countries (I've lived and voted in two). The America right will go absolutely apeshit if you criticize them from the point of view of a other country by saying "you have voter ID laws, you just want the USA to fail by allowing illegals to vote"

The thing is, for example Canada or the UK (both where I never once needed to show ID to vote) have voter ID laws in case you need to produce ID, but you probably don't. Because for most people you are registered to vote, you pay taxes, the government knows where you live and who lives there.

I turn up at a polling place with my name and address and they hand me my ballot. If another me showed up earlier, or later it'd be immediately apparent there was a problem when I tried to vote again.

If you aren't in this position, that's where vote ID comes in. What the right wingers in America never say is that almost any kind of ID at all that has your name on it is acceptable. There are hundreds of acceptable forms of ID and it's as broad as possible.

Also if all that fails and you literally have nothing to show for it, you can literally ask someone who is registered to just vouch for you. Yep, that's bill, he's a citizen as far as I know. Now bill gets a ballot.

We're allowed to have voter ID laws because we're using them to make sure absolutely everyone is able to vote while still ensuring secure elections. We're not using them to purge voter rolls and make sure you need an obscure specific government ID card in order to have the "privilege" (you see cause it's not a privilege, it's a right)

[–] anewfox@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

one thing you forgot to mention is that the american right wants these new voter IDs to implement a poll tax. they pretend like they aren't pushing that when someone explains to them why voter IDs are racist and classist, but the entire point is to disenfranchise non-white and poor voters with a poll tax. it fits right in line with red areas removing polling places from e.g. majority black neighborhoods.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 6 days ago

in other countries its feasible and easy to have a national iD, in the states you have to go through a huge process to get one. also having more people votes hurts the estasblishment politicians in general.

load more comments
view more: next ›