John Ridley Boldly Proclaims His Scrapped Marvel TV Show Was 'Eternals But Good' (gizmodo.com)

submitted 10 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/moviesandtv@lemm.ee

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 26 points 10 months ago

[removed by mod]

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I didn't hate Eternals, but I had some complaints. Mainly, I think it needed to be a series. Not enough time was given to each of the characters to grow and breathe. They're trying to set these characters up as critical to the future of the Cosmic Universe, AND explain why they haven't interfered before now, AND explain why they are going to suddenly abandon all of their foundational beliefs to save the Earth, AND introduce an ancient evil that nobody's noticed until now, AND one has a severely traumatic past, another is deeply in love with the traumatized one, another is a benign mind control cult leader, another wants to be human, another lives a life of fame, another is an empath dating the Black Knight, and I haven't even mentioned the first deaf and first gay superheroes in the MCU.

It was overly ambitious, and should have been a series. Honestly, I think they scrapped the series because they didn't want to draw comparisons to Inhumans.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

A short six part series would have given me time to care about the characters or any of it really.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Exactly, but it would need to be good. And I suppose that's the point of the article.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Thank you. The hate for The Eternals has always seemed overblown to me. I like the characters, and the story and premise are interesting - and by that I mean the good kind of “interesting”, not the version of “interesting” that you use as an adjective when you’re trying not to hurt someone’s feelings.

I’ve watched it several times. It’s not flawless, or my favorite Marvel film, but it’s certainly better than average. It’s a nice change of pace, and for me, a welcome addition to the MCU.

[-] snowe@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago

I completely agree with everything you said.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago

Interesting! I suspect it's one of those things that's a reasonably good divider or litmus test.

Like there are two kinds of MCU fans ... those that hated Eternals and those who liked or appreciated it.

And, not to be snobby or anything ... but maybe finding a way to make both types of fans happy was the key, and instead the MCU has probably tried to listen a bit too much to the haters.

[-] Glaive0@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

The thing is, having scores of haters means you’re doing something worth hating and if you have something to say, they’ll probably be right there to hate on it regardless. However, if you do your best to cave to every criticism and say nothing at all, even your haters will move on along and so will most others. The haters will absolutely say “told you so” on the way out, though.

But definitely listen to the people who want a 3rd act that wasn’t built 2 years before the script was released. Musicals, Kevin. Fight scenes are like songs in musicals.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Fight scenes are like songs in musicals.

Had not thought about it that way ... but yes! ... makes complete sense!

Is there anything you can point to that talks about this?

[-] Glaive0@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

I want to say Nando V. Movies or Sideways (man I miss Sideways) on YouTube has something on it, MAYBE breadsword, but I couldn’t find any recommendations on where it’s mentioned as it wasn’t a headlining aspect of any of their videos. There’s a 0.5% chance that that’s my own extrapolation from watching them for years.

Basically. In a musical, if the emotions are too much for talk, sing, and use that song to really reveal what you’re doing and what you’re all about. In a hero movie, if there’s too much personal beef to talk, hero up and/or fight, and use that heroicism to tell the story OF that personal conflict and of that self actualization.

Black widow comes to mind most with this:

Alexi has a character arc of having fought Captain America, but he confronts someone trained on Cap (taskmaster) without ever actually really fighting “Cap” or acknowledging the possibility. Nando has a video on this that seems to only still work on Nebula. The YouTube version is there, but doesn’t load. It also doesn’t mention anything about musicals.

https://nebula.tv/videos/nando-red-guardians-rematch-one-small-change-to-black-widow/

The character has this I-fought-Cap thing as part of his character, possibly part of his character arc, if it were a musical, he’d have gotten a few major lines in joint I-want or conflict song, then he steps up to that moment and no one wrote a “song” for him or even honored an earlier number with a leitmotif. The “music” was already written and the actualization for one of your primary support characters is acted out, but given no real attention or connection to the character arc. They forgot the earlier part was written because the climax of the story was already in place without any connective tissue to the rest of the “music”.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Oh yea, I had basically extrapolated from Sideways too the moment I read your comment!

And yea, miss them too. I was unaware of their fight with Neely until I noticed that I missed them and looked them up. While I suspect they’re overreacting a bit and could handle the whole thing better and more effectively, I’m inclined to side with them just because I like them (and would prefer them to Neely’s more obviously “I’m an ambitious influencer” vibe.

And though I’ve not seen black widow, I can imagine what you’re talking about. Thanks!

[-] Glaive0@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

Ah, sad day. I didn’t know that about Sideways and Neely. I like both of their content a lot.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Right. Yea they’ve been at it for a while, it’s the main reason sideways stopped posting.

He did make a video about the whole thing recently, but it’s unlisted last I checked.

[-] Gur814@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

This is the best analysis I’ve seen on this and couldn’t agree more. I also felt the same after The Last Jedi. I left the theater extremely happy that they were trying something different only to go online and see that so many people hated it. And the Star Wars fandom has only degraded from there. “Mutually dependent downward spiral” is a great way to put it.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I was pleased with it as well but despite trying to avoid spoilers I had heard the casino scene was a good time for piss break. I took it and that may have influenced my view.

It was never going to be a good trilogy with the lack of cohesion Disney allowed but it was interesting at the time. I haven't watched it since release though.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Nice addition. I have the same feelings about last Jedi. And look what happened to that trilogy once they tried to appease the fans!

[-] aubertlone@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's a metaphor for abortion and how important it is sometimes. That's my read.

I don't know is, that a lame take on the movie? It wasn't an amazing movie, but it had a very interesting message I thought.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Yea maybe. I hadn't picked up that it was intended as a massively direct metaphor, though it's definitely there. But it was definitely touching on the whole cosmic scale cycle of life thing and how there can be hard realities you gotta sometimes face.

[-] aubertlone@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I mean, that's what I took away as well.

But.... Isn't that also abortion in general?

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Oh for sure.

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

That's a low ass bar

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

And what else would he say anyway? Hey that show i wanted to do but couldn't would've been so ass you wouldn't believe it.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

“It was a television version of The Eternals… but good,” Ridley recently told the Comic Book Club podcast of his planned ABC series.

“There was the version that [Marvel] ended up doing,” Ridley went on to add, referring to Chloé Zhao’s 2021 movie.

His body of work speaks to his talent, just as it did for Chloe Zhao ahead of her movie version.

But they all knew their scopes, even when they did lean more into the fantastical, they worked for the medium and scale they were telling their stories in, and played with that freedom even as their cinematic siblings kept giving them the cold shoulder.

This is, however, to knock the Marvel TV we were getting at the time (or a couple years later at least) that honestly is more closer to what Eternals would’ve had to do on ABC: Inhumans.

There is forever a chance, even though we’ll never see it, that an Eternals TV show could’ve been the “But Good” version.

The original article contains 508 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city 0 points 10 months ago

Dang. That sounds awesome.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024

55 points (88.7% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2114 readers

53 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

Be civil.
Please do not link to pirated content.
No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Djinn@lemm.ee