this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
64 points (95.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

16747 readers
293 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I hate it when states use their death statistics to push a little message on their billboards:

OVER 200 KIILLED THIS YEAR... so: ...Buckle up! ... Don't Drink & Drive! ... Obey the Speed Limit!

Supporting the lie that safety is possible with cars.

[–] Schemen110676@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Comparing numbers with similar develope countries show that improvements can be made.. significant improvements at that

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The sign warning us about traffic deaths is the improvement, in their eyes.

I'm not saying things can't get better, but they don't get better from people making better individual choices, which is what that sign clearly implies.

But I am also saying things can't get THAT much better without giving people options to get out of cars without getting killed by cars.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

No engineering, no enforcement and no education. Can't imagine why things aren't improving.

[–] inbn@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

One traffic death is of course too many, but it is good to see the trend moving downward by about 10% per year and also across all kinds of mobility. Any idea as to why? Hopefully it shows a sign of building out better pedestrian infrastructure.

[–] Jump365@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pedestrian 118 is just idiotic. I understand car accidents can happen, but a pedestrian??? That tells me you purposely ignore crosswalks or drive recklessly in slow speed areaa

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pedestrian 118 is just idiotic. I understand car accidents can happen, but a pedestrian??? That tells me you purposely ignore crosswalks or drive recklessly in slow speed areaa

is this a joke?

[–] TaTTe@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I think they mean that drivers ignore crosswalks. I also first assumed they meant pedestrians ignore crosswalks, but in the context that doesn't make any sense.

And yeah, I agree. Car accidents with fatal outcome are expected in areas with high speeds, but those areas shouldn't be where pedestrians usually walk. This makes 25% of road fatalities being pedestrians seem quite insane.

[–] Jump365@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago

No? Do you think it's a sign of excellent driving that pedestrians are getting killed?