Bret Schur gives a overview of the paper - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLdXbHBD_MM
He does call it a control trial, but i think he just got confused with RCT (the paper defines this as clinical trail), other then that, great video.
A casual community to talk about LCHF/Ketogenic lifestyles, issues, benefits, difficulties, recipes, foods.
The more science focused sister community is !metabolic_health@discuss.online
Rules
Bret Schur gives a overview of the paper - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLdXbHBD_MM
He does call it a control trial, but i think he just got confused with RCT (the paper defines this as clinical trail), other then that, great video.
TLDR: Keto more effective in reducing live fat after 10% weight loss vs low fat plant based, and mediterranean. Keto 700% as effective at reducing blood glucose levels.
about 6 months for each diet intervention, long enough to actually adapt, they measured ketones, but only once during a 24 hour period at base and at 10% weight loss, with ketone levels 0.4-0.7 mmol/L... so very mild ketosis
ooph the paper reaffirms CICO in the introduction
Weight loss resulted in greater remission of prediabetes in participants in the very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet group (50%) than the Mediterranean (29%) and very-low-fat plant-forward (7%) diet groups (P<0.05)
why isn't that the headline? keto 700% as effective as a plant forward diet in reversing prediabetes
There is concern that a high-saturated-fat diet has adverse effects on plasma lipids and cardiovascular disease risk38,39. However, weight loss induced by a very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet – containing 23% of energy from saturated fat – resulted in similar effects on total and LDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, 24-hour triglycerides, and blood pressure as the Mediterranean and very-low-fat plant-forward diets.
ha! they fixed the study, its only obese people, so they wont have any LMHRs by definition... not sure if it was intentional or not, but the fact LDL didn't rise in obese people isn't a surprise, and I'm not sure it would help the naysayers back off
its a great paper with really solid data collected, it's worth reading and evaluating in depth.