77
submitted 6 months ago by kionite231@lemmy.ca to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Today, I made switch to fedora silverblue and then rebased to ublue image because it has flatpak included in the image. I am also thinking about making my own image based on silverblue. there is a video made by bigpod a youtuber about how to make your own custom ublue image and I learned a lot from that video. I am using toolbox to install various software and I am linking it however I am thinking if toolbox consumes more RAM and CPU. I guess I will find out ones I install silverblue on my laptop with old HDD.

I downloaded my favourite browser from flathub. the flathub repo isn't enabled by default in kinoite image of ublue. I have also find a way to export toolbox container to move it to different machine.

So yeah, I am liking it so far :D

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] juli@programming.dev 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What do you mean ublue has flatpak included in the image?

[-] kionite231@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

I mean flatpak binary. Other people have mentioned that it's already included in fedora silverblue. I didn't know that.

[-] uzay@infosec.pub 20 points 6 months ago

I mean, it's the main way of installing software in immutable Fedora distributions, so it would be very surprising if it wasn't preinstalled.

[-] Unmapped@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Doesn't normal Fedora silverblue already have flatpak? Why did you have to rebase to ublue for flatpak?

[-] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

then rebased to ublue image because it has flatpak included in the image.

From Silverblue's Getting Started Guide:

Flatpak is the primary way that apps can be installed on Fedora Silverblue (for more information, see flatpak.org). Flatpak works out of the box in Fedora Silverblue...

Just seems very odd to distrohop for one main reason (flatpak in this scenario), without even checking if that reason is available in your current distro....which it is, out of the box.

[-] uzay@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago

Tbf I think it's very easy to rebase a Fedora Silverblue install to ublue or vice versa

[-] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I'm not saying it's hard, just illogical. To me, it came across similar as: "I'm moving to this other distro because they have Firefox." Your current distro also has Firefox, so why are you moving again?

[-] uzay@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago

For sure. I just meant that it's just putting in a command and waiting for a bit, so I could understand doing it on a whim more than if it was a full reinstall. Doesn't make any sense but it's also not a big deal.

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

I need to play around with Silverblue and other immutable distros. Been considering them for a family member that is interested in switching to Linux.

Glad it's been good to you so far!

[-] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

Silverblue rocks, I use it for my mission critical laptop.

For gaming it's hard to beat Arch, still, because of how much active development is being put in by people like Steam.

[-] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 3 points 6 months ago

I am also thinking about making my own image based on silverblue. there is a video made by bigpod a youtuber about how to make your own custom ublue image

Before you create your own uBlue image, I highly recommend checking out some of the existing images here: https://universal-blue.discourse.group/t/list-of-community-created-custom-images/340 or here.

Personally, as a gamer, I use Bazzite, but recently I've rebased to a fork of it with my own customisations, and it's been amazing.

Distrobox > Toolbox btw. Both use podman behind the scenes but Distrobox is a bit more easier to use/fleshed out for desktop usage (eg makes it easy to export/integrate container apps with your the host).

I'd also recommend checking out Nix for installing any packages not on Flatpak or your Distrobox distro, as Nix has its own advantages since it's you're running real application binaries directly on your host OS, instead of an exported script (as in the case of Distrobox), so you get better/direct access to system resources and won't face some of the quirks/bugs you may get from running a containerised app.

[-] sibloure@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

I've been using Silverblue as my main computer for a couple years now and love it. It just always works and is super solid. I layered on distrobox for any other software so I can pretty much run any Linux software ever needed and it's cleanly organized in containers.

[-] risencode@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Okay, thanks for your blog post buddy 👍

[-] itsralC@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Thanks for your positivity bro, don't see that often around here

[-] 4z01235@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
77 points (92.3% liked)

Linux

45531 readers
1236 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS