I'm commenting because I'm also interested in this. I do (fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your perspective) agree with a lot the two say, find them pretty likeable and to me it did seem like they were interested in presenting a mostly neutral/open view on any issues. But I also acknowledge that they're allowed to have complex opinions and that those might sometimes clash with mine. And they're also not infallible and never claimed to be, so it could also be a lack of research on a particular topic.
I think in the worst case, it'll be similar to how I view Hassan Piker (spelling?) / the Chinese government: Even if I disagree on very important issues, I might still have some ideas in common. People are complex and stuff.