this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
572 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

88199 readers
2928 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pixiribbit@lemmy.world 29 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

facebook has become such a sinister platform. i've witnessed several members of my family become radicalized by their algorithms pushing conspiratorial rhetoric. the worst part? they refuse to use anything else. there's just something about facebook that has them convinced it's reputable.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It creates the illusion of socializing while using the Fox News formula of alternating between titillation and fear. That and youtube idiots and podcast bros have ruined so many people's lives.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 40 points 9 hours ago (5 children)
[–] BitsAndBites@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago (3 children)
  1. Promote
  2. Viable
  3. Alternatives

The problem is that this isn't like Microsoft Office > LibreOffice/OnlyOffice/whatever. You're not on Facebook for Facebook, you're on Facebook for the people there. It's why I have a lot of issues getting off of YouTube. I'm not on YouTube because their interface is nice, I'm on YouTube because the people I want to watch don't post shit elsewhere. It's a cycle, to get users we need stuff, and for stuff we need creators, and for creators we need users. When it comes to online platforms we don't need an alternative to YouTube, we need an alternative to Markiplier, which is harder to come up with.

If you can get your friends, and family onto Friendica that would help quite a bit. The problem is that using a new server is hard for the end user (I would know, all of my fediverse presence is on servers I host), and telling someone "Use Friendica" is like telling someone to "Use email". Get a Friendica/Mastodon/Whatever server, and keep it in your back pocket. Give them a link to that server, not to Friendica/Mastodon/Whatever as a whole.

Admittedly I don't know how hard it is to stop using Facebook because I stopped using Facebook right after they took away the chronological timeline, and stopped using Messenger a few years ago. But spending some time to get a timeline together that you can boost will help any new users you recruit. Crucially, to promote viable alternatives, you need to be part of the viable alternatives, otherwise you're just someone telling someone to jump into something new with 0 guidance, which is a good way to have them leave.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

The viable alternative is nothing.

Because no one gives a shit about you (general you, not specific at BitsAndBites), or about what you say. You use it cause you're addicted to performing for people you dont even talk to or like, because no one can actually maintain hundreds, if not thousands of connections like you collect on facebook, most of whom don't even give a shit about you. its just a mutual masturbation session, only instead of jerking each others dicks off, your jerking eachother off with pointless likes.

All social media is, is a means of generating profit from mental illness, and manufacturing mental illness for profit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

Facebook to Friendica

Twitter/Threads to Mastodon/Euclavd

Instagram to Pixelfed/Vernissage

Tiktok to Loops

YouTube to PeerTube

Anything else?

[–] freudian_slop@programming.dev 3 points 6 hours ago

Reddit to Lemmy / PieFed / PyLova

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

the problem is people are so addicted to it, at least in my province. They don't want to hear about any alternative that would require the smallest effort. In the 80's, Dead Kennedys made an album called "Give me convenience or give me death". I took me decades to realize how accurate this title was for depicting the world we live in.

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Big liZard in my back yard! Heh thanks I haven't thought of them in a while

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 1 points 4 hours ago

Did you know, if you use uBlock origin, you can add these to your "My Filters" custom filter list:

||facebook.com^  
||instagram.com^  

And you'll never accidentally surf to one of those again?

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 51 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

The production in question is an adaptation of “A Room of One’s Own,” a book by the legendary English author and feminist Virginia Woolf. According to the Teatre Raval, planned promotional posts about the show were blocked on both Instagram and Facebook, likely by an automated content moderation system.

After reaching out to Meta about why the promo campaign had been stomped out, the company replied that “any mention of civil rights, feminism or social reform are usually classified as ‘social topics’ by our automatic system,” and therefore rejected.

According to the Guardian, the company then cryptically recommended the Raval remove “key words” related to social activism, so the promo campaign can pass the automated censor — though the company failed to explain what, exactly, its content system objected to.

”We don’t know if the publicity has been rejected because of the name of Virginia Woolf or because of the word feminism, or both,” Clara Sanchis, who stars in the one-woman show told the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia, per the Guardian, which translated the comments. 

“In any case, it’s a way of erasing from the map advances that have taken centuries to achieve,” Sanchis continued. “We have given social media unlimited power and every day we can see how dangerous this is. It’s bias and manipulation.”

It’s not going to stop at Meta just like it did not stop at Roe v Wade being overturned.

I’m sick of men telling me that I’m overreacting about these issues.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

I’m sick of men telling me that I’m overreacting about these issues.

The ones telling you that you're over reacting are the ones who have a vested interest in your downfall

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There is no over-reaction to actual censorship.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 hours ago

Absolutely. It's not just the censorship though - it's the attack on women's rights that I'm referencing.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t take that shit from no man. They can think whatever the fuck that want of me. I don’t need anyone let alone a fucking little bitch of a man acting as if he’s better than me.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

Hell yes.

I’m going to keep telling men that they’re wrong as long as they want to tell me I’m overreacting. I’m not scared of doing so.

I’m just sick of it.

[–] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 5 points 9 hours ago

And what is really gross is that they will place it at the level of social/corporate discourse. Continuing the facade that they are a "publisher" and not town square.

Meaning there will be no legal option to prevent groups like meta/FB and Twitter from throttling down real social issues. While turning the volume up on "state approved rebellion".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 24 points 10 hours ago (9 children)

Meta’s content moderation system stepped in ... on the grounds that it violated a rule on promoting “social topics...”

Advertising is social by its very nature and I can't imagine any sort of serious ad that wouldn't fall under that "social" umbrella.

An ad that suggested "Stay home and do nothing" would still be a case of one human being reaching out to another human being.

I know my reasoning isn't going to make Meta crumble, but I do want to make it clear how dishonest and craven this is.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

it's very easy to find out by reading the article you decided to comment on

[–] ruplicant@sh.itjust.works 42 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

what the actual fuck. almost every week I hear about Meta failing to remove scams, child porn or hateful shit from their platforms, and now this..?

enormous amounts of people are hanging in a Nazi bar everyday but they're just too comfortably addicted to do otherwise. it's sick

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 65 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Oh so they are capable of banning the ones they don't like, just not the ones that are actively harmful and illegal?

Fuck off meta. Really wish more people would stop using their shit. Shun those who work for them while you are at it. You work for the nonce glasses company? Eww

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 47 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So they can actively steer and/or block ad content. Judges of the world, please take note.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago

We’ve known this for 20 years, but because money they’re allowed to spread literal child porn

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 111 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Stop being political!" say the people running the manufactured hate machine.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 27 points 13 hours ago

"stop saying things we dont like" is what they mean

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 24 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

But hardcore porn is perfectly fine.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

hardcore child porn, to be exact.

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 145 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Meta wants to be the global town square, but apparently Virginia Woolf and feminism are too dangerous for its ad system. Meanwhile the company keeps asking us to trust its algorithms with billions of people’s speech. If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content, maybe it shouldn’t be the internet’s self appointed censor.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 4 points 8 hours ago

If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content,

You misunderstand... Feminist literature is the prohibited content. I'm not making a joke here. That's literally their policy!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 48 points 14 hours ago

while promoting or ignoring CSAM, and possibly SA.

[–] statelesz@slrpnk.net 31 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I don't get why Instagram is still so incredibly popular in 2026.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

They've made it addicting. Its constant dopamine.

[–] kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

instagram has never given me dopamine.

using it just makes me annoyed to see friends post surface level shit to make them look better

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Thank GOD! The ONLY Ads I want to see on Meta are Child Porn Apps and Political Ads!

-Facebook users apparently!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›