this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
111 points (91.1% liked)

Canada

12426 readers
635 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Once again, we need a source more than what appears to be a word processor with a typed list. The OG link at the "dailyspill" on reddit provides no other source or claim.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least it's not a screenshot of someone's Notes app

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It basically is though, without actual proof this is just a word document

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah fair, it's mildly a step above. The whole Reddit watermark shit also makes it look downright clownish and unserious.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Honestly that brings a level below a notes app for me lol

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Link to the Reddit post? Link to an actual source?

I just can't believe someone leaked this to a subreddit...

[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheDailySpill/comments/1w1n0pi/the_leaked_us_trade_demands_that_caused_canada_to/ Also this is not breaking news in Canada, although it was published in Canada in long form articles and on long form in depth reporting on Canadian news, it is, or a week ago it was breaking news in the US.

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Then how is it "leaked"? And who was it leaked to?

Most of that reporting was based on public statements made by key politicians and negotiators. Some of it was expanded upon on background. "Leaked US trade demands" is a dishonest claim. As far as I know, there can be no list of demands because there were only verbal discussions. Those talks broke down as they were beginning to put them in writing. So this isn't a leaked list and it also isn't a list of things that were leaked. So what is it? Just a list from an unknown author, I guess.

Edit: Thanks for the link!

[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In Canada the politicians involved pussy footed around and didn't do more that the broad strokes, but apparently someone in the press got leaked a set of documents that they then had people in the know verify. They didn't release it all at once for a few days, and then released the story in long form. Then a bunch of people on reddit put the hot button issues in a 4 or 5 point format, and then other people picked up the story themselves. Short form content didn't talk about it though. Then a couple of weeks go buy and it starts going into the US Press, but they wanted to keep the God-King happy so they only talked about the hot button issues in general. I haven't come across it but they could have put it in a point form, but for all that means this could be AI making a summary.

Then 9 days ago this appears and it was breaking news to them so they said it was "Just Leaked". If that is just leaked that would be like coming home from a vacation and finding a wet bathroom floor from a leak.

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any source for this claim? I havent seen any reliable news source pick up this story and go with it except for random reddit 'news' or twitter by non-journalists.

[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay, but 2/3 of those items listed in the image above, and in the previous one that circulated aren't mentioned in any articles I've seen discussing the breakdown. For example, jurisdictional preemption on critical minerals hasn't been mentioned anywhere.

Additionally, the article you linked it vague as to the problems with the cancon streaming requirements and which were the sticking point, but the infographic above makes a bunch of claims about which ones they wanted dropped/changed without any sources providing that level of detail.

[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

If you lack the reading comprehension to understand what is being said in the article then this discussion is over.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

USA: Be the 51st state or well make you the 51st state.

CAN: No.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

MAGA: we don't need anything from Canada

Also MAGA: we demand this from Canada

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The USA empire needs to be brought down by the world.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because Americans can't be counted on to fix their shit.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Dems don't care about Canada.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

They're doing that themselves already.

[–] OldCrow@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mark Carney's speech at Devos! He's standing up to the USA.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Gotta develop all weapon orders with Canadian, European and Asian partners and leave NORAD.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago

The things demanded on Canada is some vassal state shit. No country should ever be subject to such one sided deals.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago

Doesn't really look all that official, and the source is generally unknown.

That said, in terms of the trade war, I'm surprised Canada hasn't demanded that we include the service-deficit/trade in the calculations. The trade deficits the Americans like to quote, don't include things like, say, how much Canada spends on Microsoft, Netflix, Apple, etc.

[–] DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

Hostile takeover.

[–] OldCrow@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

I listened, again, to Mark Carney's Davos speech. Thank you, Mark, for standing up to the lunatic!

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not everyone can read images. Can someone provide a text version?

[–] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From The Daily Spill community on Reddit

The Leaked List of Demands that Made Canada Refuse Trumps Trade Agreement

Summary of Key U.S. Demands in 2026 Canada-U.S. Trade Negotiationsr

/TheDailySpill

This document outlines the key demands put forward by the U.S. administration during the August 2026 tariff and trade negotiations, which led to the suspension of talks by Canadian officials over concerns regarding national sovereignty and economic autonomy.

Overview of Core Concerns and Demands

Veto Over Strategic Infrastructure Partnerships: Demands that Canada submit all major foreign investments in domestic infrastructure (including ports. telecommunications, energy pipelines, and power grids) to a joint U.S.-Canada review board, granting Washington functional veto power over foreign investment inside Canada.

Preemptive Trade Restrictions on Non-U.S. Nations: Mandates forcing Canada to match U.S. sanctions, export controls, and import tariffs on third-party countries automatically, forfeiting Canada's right to establish independent foreign trade relations.

Jurisdictional Preemption on Critical Minerals: Requirements for the U.S. to receive guaranteed right-of-first-refusal and price caps on all unrefined critical minerals (e.g., lithium, nickel, cobalt, uranium) extracted in Northern Canada, restricting domestic processing and export to other allies.

Rescinding the Digital Services Tax & Online News Act: Demands for the total repeal of Canadian legislation requiring foreign tech platforms to pay taxes on revenues earned from Canadian users and compensate Canadian news publishers.

Elimination of Cultural and Language Protections: Direct demands to dismantle Canadian-content (CanCon) quotas, roll back the Online Streaming Act, and exempt U.S. goods and digital services from provincial language laws, specifically targeting Quebec's French-language protections.

Elimination of "Buy Canada" Public Procurement Rules: Requirements that Canadian federal, provincial, and municipal governments grant American companies equal access to tender for public infrastructure contracts. prohibiting preferences for local or Canadian suppliers.

Dismantling Agricultural Safeguards: Demands for administrative measures or removals compromising Canada's supply management system for dairy, egg, and poultry sectors, alongside demands to automatically adopt U.S. chemical and pesticide standards.

Unilateral Alteration of Auto Rules: Exclusion of heavy

assembly plants and key auto sectors from tariff relief, combined with restructured rules aimed at shifting auto assembly jobs directly into the U.S.

Pharmaceutical Patent Extensions: Demands to extend data exclusivity periods for foreign pharmaceutical firms, delaying generic drug access in Canada and driving up provincial healthcare costs.

Priority Allocation of Canadian Energy: Requirements for priority allocations and price guarantees on Canadian crude oil, natural gas, hydroelectricity, and nuclear energy exported to the U.S.

Binding Military & Arctic Mandates: Mandates forcing Canada to hit specific defense spending benchmarks dedicated strictly to purchasing U.S.-made military hardware for Arctic surveillance and NORAD Upgrades.

Lowering Customs & De Minimis Rules Demands to reduce tax thresholds on cross-border e-commerce, giving American retailers tax-free access to Canadian consumers at the expense of local businesses.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Cheers! Much easier to read, even as a sighted person πŸ˜…

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Anglo Canadians: bwahahahahah... FUCK no.

French Canadians: honghongonhon... non tabernak ostie.

Newfoundlanders: heheheh... no ting dere by.