this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
46 points (97.9% liked)

United Kingdom

6918 readers
396 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

how's that possible? every time I see a post about the US all the uk users are taking the piss out of Americans.

you're telling me this fascistic rise isn't just happening in the US?

1000004572

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I've honestly come to the conclusion that a disturbing amount of Europeans, some who are very vocal in their disdain for him and often American culture in general, would like Trump if he sounded less brash and didn't antagonize Europe.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's when the article leads with

  • Former Minister turned Reform member Nadine Dorries backs calls for review of “dogs dinner” online safety laws her government led

that I tuned out, sorry. Mad Nad isn't a great advocate for free speech.

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 2 points 6 days ago

,,Free speech" for the right wing means ,,freedom to manipulate public opinion to our desire by the will of our rich donors which happen to own the platforms".

[–] tangentism@beehaw.org 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Especially seeing as she was championing it and now she's getting behind the campaign to either roll it back or amend it.

She was fucking clueless about it's impact when it was being spearheaded yet thought she knew better than everyone else and now thinks she knows better because it's dawned on her just how regressive and overreaching it is.

A clear demonstration of why the entire political class should get in the bin

[–] mtpender@piefed.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, yes, let us blow up Parliament and install a Catholic monarch!

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That is what Guy Fawkes was trying to do, but that's like, the opposite of the plot of V for Vendetta

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yes, as much as I agree with the core message of V for Vendetta (people should not be afraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of their people), it's very funny to me that this fanatical religious monarchist has been adopted as a symbol of anti-government rebellion. It's absurd. Fawkes was about as far from an anarchist as you could possibly get.