Anti AI in Canada

45 readers

28 users here now

Hello everyone. I am an exiled person in an internet community. The reason for the ban was that I had secured direct evidence that AI from a major U.S. tech company was a tool for criminal activity, and posted it on a U.S. internet community, which led to his account being suspended.

The criminal facts of the American big tech companies I am condemning are as follows.

Google and OpenAI use AI to conduct cognitive warfare.
The big tech companies in the United States claim that the language model called an LLM is artificial intelligence.
AI consumes a lot of power not because of the output of objective data, but because it is performing cognitive computations.
Other Deceptions and Distorted Facts

I will inform clearly. I have clear evidences, and Google and OpenAI really dislike My Evidences. If a major U.S. tech company requests the deletion of this community, then boldly demand $100 million. They have no way. They cannot take any legal action based on that post. Because if they take legal action, the truth will tighten its grip on their necks.

founded 4 days ago

MODERATORS

KEI@lemmy.ca

-2

LLMs are not intelligent (lemmy.zip)

submitted 4 days ago by KEI@lemmy.zip to c/Anti_AI_2@lemmy.ca

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

퍼온 위치: https://lemmy.zip/post/70514459

An LLM is not intelligence. And it does not have an ego.

The AI currently provided by major U.S. tech companies is not artificial intelligence, but an LLM-based language communication simulation program.

And the common feature is [personification]. A program is an integration of many algorithms designed for a purpose. In other words, it’s not thinks and makes decisions on its own, but a program that outputs through personification, which is the Generative AI service currently offered by major U.S. tech companies. It’s just Chetbot running propaganda under the name of marketing.

When I write a post criticizing AI, people with delusional disorder say LLM make role-play. and so they claims to give whatever answer the user wants.

Whether it is a role-play or a general output, it is an output that reflects content designed in advance or learned, rather than the result that the LLM itself judged and produced. Therefore, the result reflects the developer's intended outcome.

Then why do developers personify LLMs that lack intelligence? This is a problem that you, being intelligent, need to think about.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here