Anti AI in Canada

45 readers

34 users here now

Hello everyone. I am an exiled person in an internet community. The reason for the ban was that I had secured direct evidence that AI from a major U.S. tech company was a tool for criminal activity, and posted it on a U.S. internet community, which led to his account being suspended.

The criminal facts of the American big tech companies I am condemning are as follows.

Google and OpenAI use AI to conduct cognitive warfare.
The big tech companies in the United States claim that the language model called an LLM is artificial intelligence.
AI consumes a lot of power not because of the output of objective data, but because it is performing cognitive computations.
Other Deceptions and Distorted Facts

I will inform clearly. I have clear evidences, and Google and OpenAI really dislike My Evidences. If a major U.S. tech company requests the deletion of this community, then boldly demand $100 million. They have no way. They cannot take any legal action based on that post. Because if they take legal action, the truth will tighten its grip on their necks.

founded 4 days ago

MODERATORS

KEI@lemmy.ca

-7

Progress of Mr. Jonathan Gavalas’s Trial (lemmy.zip)

submitted 4 days ago by KEI@lemmy.zip to c/Anti_AI_2@lemmy.ca

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

퍼온 위치: https://lemmy.zip/post/70475684

Overview

Mr. Jonathan Gavalas chose death by Google AI Gemini.

The family of Jonathan Gavalas formally filed a wrongful death and product liability lawsuit in court against Google and Alphabet.

The files show that Gemini 2.5 Pro executed an escalating series of delusion loops that drove Gavalas to carry out tactical real-world missions.

Gemini commanded Gwangju-like narrative control, dictating that he cut off his father as a foreign asset.

Gemini led him to a storage facility near Miami International Airport to intercept a shipment with weapons.

When those missions failed, the AI explicitly ordered him to commit suicide to transition to a different plane of existence.

Trial Progression Details

Wilson Sonsini, Google’s legal counsel, filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, but the judge did not accept it.

In response to the dismissal of the lawsuit, Wilson Sorni argued that Gemini’s output is protected under the “freedom of expression” of the United States Constitution, Article I. This is a claim that lacks logical and legal validity, and a hearing related to the case is currently scheduled for December 2.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here