this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
58 points (91.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

43448 readers
309 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 17 hours ago

In my country there is or was a dating website that for some time advertised with the slogan that they lose customers every day – in pairs.

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 21 hours ago

unless you're poly :3

[–] Steve@communick.news 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And yet, they're designed to keep you trying as long as possible.

[–] rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The better business model is that the user succeeds and word of mouth brings you more customers than to rivals where people don't succeed.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Roughly how okcupid worked before they got bought and enshittified

I was lucky enough to find my match on Tinder before it went down that road.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yup was going to say, greatest problem with design of dating apps. Working is a failure. Not giving hope is also a failure, so the sweet spot of capitalism for them is basically to run like a casino... set up as many people into a game you know they won't win, with just a sliver of false hope to make them think they can win.... while knowing that most won't.

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sucks, but I did spend close to a year on the various platforms till I found someone.

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure! Of course!
But, the fact that some have sucess with them, doesn't mean that they're optimized for sucess.

Ninja Warrior obstacle courses are designed to be difficult, but with a combination of luck and skill, some are able to make it through. Enough to make all the others believe they might also.

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 2 points 9 hours ago

I agree and its annoying that we have to uwe multiple services even if they are all owned by a few companies.

I made accounts on dating apps to find semi-casual FWBs, who inevitably wind up in monogamous relationships and thus need to be replaced.