Meine lieben konservativen kameraden und mitschlangen aller länder vereinigt euch!
I do not know if this original article is terribly clever or genuinely and terribly stupid.
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
234 points (98.3% liked)
wir_iel
969 readers
84 users here now
Dies ist Unser Unter!
Alle Pfosten müssen den Titel "wir_iel" haben, der Unterstrich darf durch beliebig viele Gefühlies ersetzt werden.
1. Seid nett zueinander
Diskriminierung, Rassismus und Faschismus wird in keinster Form auch nur Ansatzweise geduldet.
2. Alle Pfosten den Titel wir_iel haben
Alle Pfosten müssen den Titel "wir_iel" haben, der Unterstrich darf durch beliebig viele Gefühlies ersetzt werden.
3. Meta Pfosten sind erwünscht
Meta Pfosten sind ausdrücklich erlaubt.
4. Nein, wir nehmen uns nicht ernst
Wirklich nicht.
5. Wir benutzen das generische Femininum
Nimm das, Patriarchat!
6. Wir stehen nicht in Konkurrenz zu ich_iel
Wir pflegen einen respektvollen Umgang und nehmen auch gerne ~~West~~Packete an. Kaffee ist schließlich teuer auf dem Weltmarkt und Devisen knapp.
7. Keine KI
Aus Gründen
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It was posted to r/conservative. Definetly a god tier bait to get those nuts to agree with the unity of labor aka unions.
Oh yes indeed. I am chuckling thinking of the 1-2 smarter users in r/conservative trying to prevent the flood of likes 🤣🤣🤣👌👌👌
I was about to get angry but I think it's terribly clever.
I'm with you in thinking it a parody
May I ask what's not smart about it? The person seems to just try finding a way of out miserable financial state the best they can.
The "clever" part is describing the effects of capitalism, that a business owner profits off the value of the workers' labour without working themselves, but re-encodes it to instead be about how the workers' hard work and wages are being taken and "redistributed" to someone who didn't earn them.
This "the lazy person gets your hard work" framing is one of the most popular ways Americans are scared away from socialism or communism, so by turning the situation upside down here it's attaching the same framing to capitalism instead. And then arguing for a united workforce to protect "capitalism" from the dangers of "communism"
Roger that. Thank you for the more experienced explanation that may enlighten the case from another angle.
These are frequent employment challenges in Europe and Russia/Asia I witnessed enough to believe someone tries fighting for their rights and effort to be financially compensated. I'll reconsider it.
It's clever bait.
Wie OOP es schafft alles zwischen reinem Kapitalismus und reinem Kommunismus durch den Fleischwolf zu drehen und jeden Aspekt durch sein Gegenteil zu ersetzen, das ist schon perfekt.
Daher tippe ich eher auf Satire.
Andererseits: Truth is stranger than fiction.
Wer weiß 🤷
Ich wäre gern dabei gewesen als das in r/conservative eingeschlagen ist. Diese Suche zeigt dass es inzwischen copypasta-Status hat, von r/conservative aber längst entfernt.
Die JPGfizierung zeigt es ist vermutlich auch schon ein paar jahre her. Die kommentare waren sicher lustig
mind. 5:
https://www.reddit.com/user/concerned-anticommie/
I know the original poster is joking/trolling, but I am reading animal farm right now and I can't say I'm surprised that so many Americans reference it. It's only one hundred pages long, at that is the edition that has a puffy spacing between the lines and generous margins. It's so becoming to use as a propaganda vehicle against uprisings against oppression, even though Orwell does not strictly advocate capitalism when you read the book closely.
“Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic Socialism, as I understand it.”
- George Orwell
Even a surface level reading doesn't advocate capitalism... The ending explicitly equates communism and capitalism.
The book is anti-authoritarian, in any guise.
The ending explicitly equates communism and capitalism
And that conclusion is something that makes the book a bit ridiculous.
The book identifies concentrated power as the villain. The farmer has complete control over the lives of the animals, and used that to better his life without concern for theirs.
The pigs are given complete control, and use that power to do the same.
It doesn't matter what you call the system, concentrated power is authoritarian by definition, and is invariably harmful to those who do not hold power.
and is invariably harmful to those who do not hold power.
So, if I have someone who drags me into the military – into a losing battle perhaps – and harm them out of self defence, is that really all that terrible for my interests? I would say I would benefit greatly. If I got together with a bunch of soldiers who all are tired of fighting and decide with them to usurp our masters, how is that not concentrating the power, and more importantly how is that necessarily a bad thing?
If you don't institute an egalitarian society after the revolution, you're just replacing one authoritarian government with another. That's certainly good for you, but when you're in power, you're not part of "those who do not hold power" anymore.
Herzlichen Glückwunsch, du hast gerade Sozialismus entdeckt und Gewerkschaften erfunden.
(Konservative) Menschen sind wirklich so dumm. Ich sollte es gewohnt sein, aber es schockiert mich immer wieder. Oder ist das ein Troll-Post? Ich kanns langsam echt nicht mehr unterscheiden.
Ich bin mir auch total unsicher. Einiges sagt in mir das wurde von einen Linken Troll da gepostet. Aaaber :) ich hab so ähnliche dinge auch schon ernsthaft gehört von rechten. Also. Wenn es ein troll ist dann parodiert er zumindest reale sachen