this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
6 points (100.0% liked)

California

657 readers
25 users here now

Overview:

The inclusive California community.

Related:

!usa@midwest.social

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

ugh. in the 2008 crises and earlier ones things like this exacerbated it. monkeying with the loans just ends up getting people into real estate they can't afford. We need to have good housing that is 3x the median income and lower if we really want people to be housed.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The catch is that

  1. A smaller downpayment means a bigger loan, which means to total price of the home over the lifetime of the loan is higher.
  2. It increases the risk that the owner will default on the home, since having sufficient savings for a downpayment is a good indicator of having the financial means to keep making payments.
  3. Any time you use a financial strategy to expand homebuying power to more people, what happens is that more people can buy homes. If the market is limited in the number of homes that exist and can be produced, that drives prices up.

The math is simple. If you want more people to have homes, you need to build more homes.

[–] meat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The catch will likely be higher total prices.

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In today's news... Borrowing more money means paying back more money, and now Joe with the weather

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Also, decreasing the required downpayment increases the number of people who can make that downpayment, which increases competitive pressures for a limited number of homes, which....

say it with me

raises the prices of homes.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago