For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up
Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
Monitor every stock trade Congress and the White House makes
He noted a contempt charge would be a black mark that would hurt a lawyer for the rest of their career.
I'm guessing the firms willing to hire lawyers working for the current doj also wouldn't mind those lawyers being held in contempt of court as a show of loyalty to a pedophile.
Just another example of people higher up in the judicial system being unable to adjust to the reality of dealing with fascist.
Notice the location of the publication, it's Australia. I went through the cycle of news pubs that I think are enough of a good source, and nada.
Really? Because just searching for the judge's name turns up multiple articles from sources like MSNow and CNN.
Not when I posted this.
To be fair, it's already tomorrow in Australia, so they've had a whole extra day to get out the story.
"And if you keep stonewalling I'm going to keep threatening to do something about it one day maybe!"
That cuck is probably in the club, I swear a lot of judges are.
Do it now. Issue them like a tennis ball lobster! They want to revictimize these girls that are now grown women fighting with everything they have in them. They want to protect pedophiles and rapists. Fine.
Live with that decision and flatline their careers. Judge — you will be on the correct side of history.