this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
543 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

17190 readers
2165 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

The whole point is to avoid paying. It's a special little club these fuckers belong to and they sit around with brandy and a monocle laughing maniacally about how they got away with not paying taxes.

They'll spend more money on avoiding paying taxes then actually paying the taxes which in and of itself is... Evil.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 21 hours ago

Bullshit. Democracies are more vulnerable to outside influence than most other governments. Billionaires love democracy. Especially small democracies like Canada where it is so cheap and easy to capture regulatory offices.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

5% is dirt cheap compared to the taxes they've avoided for many DECADES.

[–] Steve@communick.news 12 points 2 days ago

5% is less than the passive income that amount of wealth makes that year!

Cheaper than what they deserve.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why don't they just fuck off? You won capitalism. You have get away with murder money. Just go and fuck off already, why do you have to make the rest of us miserable?

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Because they want more. Why? They're mentally ill.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's crazy is that he's only spending less than 1% of what the tax would cost him.

If he spent $10b and managed to save himself a $13b tax bill, he's still save $3b.

I suspect he's actually spending much more than $100m. He has probably hired expensive attorneys, expensive accountants, expensive PR firms, etc. We have to hope he hasn't hired private detectives, hackers, hit men, etc.

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Shit like this makes me think the Billionaires are afraid of wealth tax because much of their wealth isn't real. They can materialize 0.05% to fight legislation, but if they tried to liquidate a significant portion of their stocks or whatever that'd decrease the value of the rest of their fortune, not to mention somebody needs to buy what they sold.

They need other people to think what they own is valuable; and they do that by owning it, as rich people are reputable in many people's eyes. If they sell the feedback cycle inverts

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

I'm sure that's part of it. Selling enough stock to meet a 5% wealth tax would sometimes mean that selling those stocks would really drop the value of those shares, and therefore drop their on-paper wealth.

But, the simpler explanation is they don't wanna.

[–] 5318008@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't want a one-time, 5% wealth tax. I want a recurring wealth tax. At 0.5%, such a tax outpaces the one time 5% in ten years.

I would settle for one time 5%... but it's just so short-sighted. 5% in one sudden movement is actually a big ask... and are we actually going to be able to pull that off more than once?

A recurring wealth tax 1) is better in the long-term, 2) is less disruptive to the stock market (which we should care about, as long as this is the sustem we have) 3) makes for a more predictable economic environment, so people with money might actually still want to live in CA.

[–] cloudshouter@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

I promote taxing total compensation (the stock options) and putting in minimum limits on taxes for to wealthy. I have also heard people discussing ideas for having the top billionaires have forced sales of a percentage of their stock and putting possession taxes in place for land hoarding.

[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 4 points 2 days ago

END BILLIONAIRES WITH GUILOTENES

or however you spell it

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Millionaires and other parasites are so disgusting. He doesn't care about losing the money, he just doesn't want to be told what to do with it (told to give some of it back to the country).

Billionaires should be illegal. Tax the fuck outta these assholes.

[–] Hatshepsut@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Great choice of pic. Google Glasshole.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

He'd like this better than my simplified alternate tax rate of 1 head.