Is "stunts" the new "slams"?
I'm too old to keep up on current popular terminology
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
81 points (100.0% liked)
Firefox
32 readers
2 users here now
The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.
You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:
Related
- Firefox Customs: !FirefoxCSS@fedia.io
- Thunderbird: !Thunderbird@fedia.io
Rules
While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.
Rules
-
Always be civil and respectful
Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity. -
Don't be a bigot
No form of bigotry will be tolerated. -
Don't post security compromising suggestions
If you do, include an obvious and clear warning. -
Don't post conspiracy theories
Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources. -
Don't accuse others of shilling
Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate. -
Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
"stunt" is 90s/early 2000s slang.
I must not have been in the right circles, then.
I suppose it helps to actually be in circles... but still.
It's throwing me off because I thought 'stunts on' died off years ago
I don’t reckon it’s popular. We’ve known for years that “slams” is a sign of a disappointing article, but maybe we’re all actually starting to internalise it now, so now we need to mix up the headlines to keep engagement.
Yes, I have heard of the term stunt before. Shockingly.
Just not in this context, which is not in fact mentioned in the link you provided.
I don't care what hate you have for Firefox. It will always be better than any Chrome based browser. I feel 100x more secure using Firefox than anything else. Librewolf is even better.
Day later: Firefox adds more AI features enabled by default
Firefox doing well at something? Guess it's time for Firefox fans to imagine them eventually doing something else that they don't like so they can gripe about that instead.
I mean... they are kind of pushing AI right now, probably to soak some of that VC money floating around, but there is also a toggle in the settings thats basically "dont ever talk to me about AI again".
Facedeer is just an AI evangelist troll. I guess one of his goals is to try convincing people of some "silent majority" somewhere.
There's no point in arguing with him on this
They may also be pushing AI features because there are people who actually do want to use them. "Nobody wants this" is a refrain most commonly spoken inside social bubbles.
As you say, nobody has to use these features if they don't want to. If they feel icky even knowing that there's a configuration option there then there are plenty of Firefox forks out there that don't even have that. It's so tiresome seeing these complaints being endlessly inserted into unrelated discussions like this.
You know what's tiresome? Having some sort of LLM shoved in every single piece of software or service.
I want new features and bug fixes, not the same chatbot everywhere.
Previously I noticed that Firefox user count had stopped declining for the first time in many years. Only later did I realise that it was probably due to all the fuss about Chrome dropping MV2, not anything Mozilla themselves had done. Hopefully this will keep the trend line going up a little further. Who knows, maybe Mozilla will miraculously come to its senses before it resumes the long slow decline.
Where are you looking? I haven't seen the same rise in users you have... By Mozilla's own reports , it looks like Firefox is holding steady, not falling but not really rising either.
Hard agree that Mozilla can be at its best by trying to hold onto (read: not alienate) its userbase and avoid jumping onto trends. Don't mess with perfection.
The monthly active users count there is not down compared to last year at this time, although it's not up by as much as it was. Holding steady is a departure from the trend, the best it's done in a long time.
Google cutting funding in 3... 2...
Mozilla is already bending the knee to Google as they intentionally prevent their upcoming iOS ad blocker from functioning on Google or any search site.
As a non-native english speaker, these headlines sometime hurt my brain.