this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
220 points (96.2% liked)

lemmy.ml meta

1517 readers
1 users here now

Anything about the lemmy.ml instance and its moderation.

For discussion about the Lemmy software project, go to !lemmy@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It should come as no surprise that the lemmy.ml admin team took about 2 minutes to decide to pre-emptively block threats / Meta. Their transparent and opportunistic scheme to commodify the fediverse and it's users will not be allowed to proceed.

We strongly encourage other instance administrators to do the same, given the grave threat they pose to the fediverse.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gsicht@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Excellent. Big corporations go against the very idea of the fediverse.

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

Good riddance

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Sailing7@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Could you tell me where you got this view?

[–] AndyPanic@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I see that Lemmy federates with several Mastodon instances. But how can I see content from them?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemuria@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good riddance to Meta's bullshit. Stop them before they get to the first E in EEE.

Here's a sign to put up at the border between Lemmy.ml and Threads, which will surely have a 100-meter wall built on it with 50 kV electric fences, barbed wire, watchtowers, snipers, and whatever to keep those Meta corporate fuckers out.

Threads Quarantine Zone sign

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] o1o12o21@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Excellent move. Hope bluesky is next.

[–] ArghZombies@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bluesky is a different protocol.

[–] o1o12o21@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ooh, did not know that, thanks for catching that. Anyway, they shouldn't be let in as well in case they can bridge between protocols some day.

[–] ArghZombies@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What, Bluesky shouldn't be let into the fediverse, or Bluesky shouldn't let Threads in?

I don't see any problem with Bluesky. They've got a decent philosophy and approach, tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Strangle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Can someone eli5 what’s going on with this?

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

meta is trash and we don’t want its data getting all snuggly with ours. because ew.

now you’re up to speed.

edit: data privacy concerns are the main issue

[–] astraeus@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If Meta can federate with an instance, it can collect all the available data within that instance. This seems to be what everyone is overlooking on the downsides of Meta federation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bleph@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Assumption 1: Meta / Mark Z are objectively untrustworthy

Assumption 2: The Fediverse is a threat to the entire internet advertising machine

Assumption 3: Threads will be a hospitable place for right wing hatemongers. Therefore, federating with it exposes our most vulnerable users and communities to a deluge of (often invisible) hate and harassment.

Assumption 4: Most of the ways that they could use their billions of users and army of programmers to slowly choke us off would go through federation

I think if you believe all four of those assumptions defederation is the clear choice

[–] MysticSmear@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I don’t understand this logic. Don’t we want Lemmy to be more mainstream and user friendly? Preemptively blocking any mainstream attempt to connect and bring in more users just sounds slightly petulant to me. Like I get meta = shitty company but I don’t get why we shouldn’t encourage more people joining the fediverse. And getting external help in growing it. And threads was the first mainstream olive branch that showed Lemmy, Kbin, and mastodon has legitimacy worth building infrastructure to join.

Idk blocking other people categorically from connecting just seems antithetical to the idea that it should be a decentralized system free to all to join.

But I’m new here, so maybe Im mistaken on the ethos of Lemmy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gale@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is the kind of thing that made me choose this instance in the first place. Thanks for making my online social place of choice feel safe.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm still grasping the concept of the fediverse, but what is the perk to this? The Facebook mafia can't comment and join communities on lemmy.ml? But they could on say lemmy.world?

[–] ToastyWaffles@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That's correct. And you as a user of lemmy.ml, when you set your feed to 'ALL' it won't show posts or communities from those instances. But if your account is on lemmy.world, you would see them. You can also personally block any community you want. I don't think you can block certain instances on a personal level, could be wrong though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] synth@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

preemptively blocking an instance just because it’s owned by meta and not due to bad conduct is cringe as fuck

[–] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

In what universe are you living in that meta does not have a history chock full of bad conduct?! Frog, meet scorpion.

Oh, and stop misusing "cringe" while you're at it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›