this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
114 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47119 readers
485 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sorry for linking to Krone.at, which is a running joke in Austria regarding their quality, but i couldn't find an english language source anywhere else.

And it's only mildly infuriating if you are a well-tempered person - i personally find it outrageous. His main argument is that child rearing is no business case. Maybe we should make it one.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Let me guess, he's never actually done any sort of child care. Especially for children with any sort of developmental or behavioral special needs, that shit is hard work.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Sure he has. He watches then for a couple of hours every week and plays with them sometimes when dinner is being cooked.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 6 days ago

Let me guess, he has never done any kind of real work (childcare included).

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

His party says it is hard work but you should do it for free because it's "the greatest joy in the world".

Hork.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The thing is, even if that was true, massive amounts of unpaid labor with long commitments done solely for the love of it, are the first things to go when it's looking like you're gonna need to pick up more paid labor

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

He has never cared for another. A sick partner, a growing child, an infirm parent - he has never really worked a day in someone's life.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Tell me you've never cared for children without telling me you've never cared for children.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's the worst part of it - he is a father. Which means his public utterances completely devalued the years and years of work of his wife.

I'm a childless man who is not able to deal with children because i am very sensitive to voices and noise, and i understand anyone who does not want to have children. But negating that children are a ton of work very important for a functioning society that goes unrecognized because "they are no business case" is just infuriating even to me. I am ashamed to have this guy as a chancellor.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Shit. As someone with two daughters I can assure you that we can deduce that his wife has never had a genuine break from childcare however long their kids have been alive.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, unless both of them pawned the child off on a nanny.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Sounds a bit like childcare being work to me.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, i pity her. She should dump that scumbag and get a partner that wants to be there for the children - i am sure they would call the new guy "papa" faster than the divorce goes through,

[–] Steve@communick.news 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is he advocating that child care should be free?
It does sound like it.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Either that or he’s taking the stance that stay at home moms and dads are lazy bastards who do no work

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I am pretty sure he meant he meant what you said. He afterwards "apologized":

He said:" Family "is no business and no job, where you leave the office after your work is done. The payment is not to be measured in money, but in trust, family cohesion and uncountable shared moments". He knows that "how much this assignment takes from you", but family "still isn't a business case“

I say fuck him. I say the time used for rearing children should be financially compensated, since it is work that makes sure that the next generation become a valuable member of society. This time should also be valued when calculating pensions - Austria had it's "equal pension day" on 9th of August. Women in Austria work on average 96 hours per week for unpaid children care work, which would more than make up for that difference if acknowledged.

This cuts deeper than just "care work isn't work". It also devalues men who are willing to put in the work and hours to care for children together with their partner. This mindset makes it harder for men to refuse to work their ass off and never seeing their family.

I am a man. Fuck everyone who thinks like him. People like him shouldn't be "a business case", they should be sitting in a gutter dependent on the goodwill of random people - just as he expects from people who offer valueable time and work towards their children.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 3 points 5 days ago

This is inexorably tied to legacy, the kind created by having children. The politics of it is why we’ve had a mere 50yrs of equality / the hard push for true equality and millennia of…not. It is, in part, why Roe fell in the US, to push back and reclaim some of the equality given.

To devalue the unpaid labor involved, to not acknowledge the value of not just having legacy but a legacy that is nurtured, is a rollback to a time without women’s liberation. It fails to acknowledge how integral that unpaid labor is to societies, growth, development. And is entitled as fuck. The man is a cretin. Apology or not, you know who and what he is now.

[–] Dewe@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’m not trying to debate your point itself, but where are you getting the 96 hours figure from? That sounded like a lot to me, and I get a much lower figure from this source: https://fairsorgen.at/zeitverwendungsstudie-mehr-arbeit-weniger-zeit-weniger-geld/

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 3 days ago

Sorry, i adopted the number from ORF.at, where this number was cited by the woman who then got told that "childcare isn't work". I did not verify it - but maybe she referred to homesteading women, where this number might easily be reached (and still doesn't count for their pensions)

https://orf.at/stories/3438475/

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 days ago

I'm sure, to him, it isn't work, since he probably hardly ever does it

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

"Why is the birth rate so low?"

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The next generation supports the current adult generations.

Investing in the next generation is vital to ensure the continued success of the nation.

Early child development is incredibly important to long term success.

Understanding this is beyond the capability of many politicians.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

You can't expect people to understand something that they're getting paid to not understand.

[–] PNW_Doug@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Well of course it isn't! Work comes with a paycheck. Raising children produces no monetary remuneration for the parent. Ipso facto, it can't be work! The logic is flawless.

Because this is the internet: this is sarcasm.

[–] TenTonTruck@piefed.ca 6 points 5 days ago

Fuck this guy- spoken like an absentee parent

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Let me guess, he's never actually done any sort of child care. Especially for children with any sort of developmental or behavioral special needs, that shit is hard work.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

He is a father, which makes this even more awful. He publicly devalued the hard work his wife does. The most powerful person in Austria devalued his own wives work in front of a huge crowd of journalists.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'll be dropping off my kids at his office tout suite.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I wouldn't - he doesn't even care for his own children. Or the work his wive does. Or the work that is done in kindergardens and schools.

[–] LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This reminds me of a deleted scene from The Incredibles (2004) in which Helen confronts a party guest who said that it's a waste of potential to spend years caring for your children instead of working:

https://youtu.be/sh8Vz_7obMM?t=255

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

i mean it depends on how you define work. if you go by this definition, then basically any mechanical movement (as long as the force is non-zero) is work. therefore, just standing up in the morning, is work.