this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
297 points (99.0% liked)

deflock.me

412 readers
582 users here now

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) are AI-powered cameras that capture and analyze images of all passing vehicles, storing details like your car’s location, date, and time. They also capture your car’s make, model, color, and identifying features such as dents, roof racks, and bumper stickers, often turning these into searchable data points. These cameras collect data on millions of vehicles—regardless of whether the driver is suspected of a crime. While these systems can be useful for tracking stolen cars or wanted individuals, they are mostly used to track the movements of innocent people.

Learn more at deflock.me

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Amazing. How true is this? Anyone got a source?

Edit: ah, they only had 8 cameras. Still, that's amazing.

https://www.wqow.com/news/crime/winona-police-all-8-flock-cameras-stolen-poles-cut-at-base/article_62f9942f-690e-46a5-aa48-6798fbab3665.html

The flock flew away to the southern hemisphere for their yearly migration, I'm sure their babies will be back next year.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

Whomever the suspect was they were fucking my mother that night and there is no way they could have done it because it was going on all night long.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

This is a known issue with flock systems, sometimes they just do that.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 6 points 3 hours ago

The weird thing is, if I ever see someone tearing down Flock cameras, actually no I didn't.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

The top fell off

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

Agreed, a well known software bug is taking flock cameras down across the country. Hopefully they can fix it before it gets too out of hand.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 11 points 6 hours ago

Yeah it was really weird. I saw one just destroy itself.

Serious issue.

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 70 points 7 hours ago (7 children)

If the surveillance cameras can’t even catch the persons who removed all of their cameras, then they have proven to be worthless at catching real criminals, with their only proven worth is stalking police officers ex wives.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 6 points 3 hours ago

People removing surveillance cameras taxpayers didn't approve aren't "criminals". The proper term is heroes.

That's just not true. Sometimes they haven't even met the women they're stalking.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 hours ago

Must have been the wind

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 50 points 7 hours ago (7 children)

This is a city of ~25K people, so quite small. Several articles have pointed out that the city, not Flock, bears the costs of the vandalism, so in this instance the city counsel that enabled the city to enter into the contract with Flock to the detriment of its citizens have now burdened the city with a substantial budget item. If the cameras are replaced, you can bet that they will likely be torn down again. At some point there will be a reckoning with voters, and hopefully the idiots that enabled the surveillance state will be voted out.

[–] Sabrinamycarpet@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 minutes ago

Even if it's the city that beats the cost, at some point they will decide it's no longer worth the cost to replace them.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

They don't even have to be voted out if the voters persuade them to resign.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

All of Winona, Minnesota was with me, in Switzerland, on a river on an inflatable raft, enjoying the heat wave. Couldn't have been them.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

The cameras fell down on their own

Let me know if you find who did it, so I can go down on them until my jaw rots off.

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 hours ago

One witness said "I'm Glad members of the community do civic duties, but we don't need to active about finding their identity, I'm sure they did it as a gift for society"

[–] Tango@piefed.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

"I was right there with a bodycam when they all tore themselves down but it was turned off for, uh, routine maintenance."

[–] Bonus@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] humble_boatsman@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Holy shit I just had the epiphany of a lifetime. I have that fucking cutter.

[–] Bonus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 35 minutes ago

Nothin to it but for you to do it.

[–] AnalogAllamma@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago
[–] notsure@fedia.io 4 points 5 hours ago

I thought Winona had a big brown beaver...perhaps I was mistaken

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

They're easy to cut down for now. The next step is going to be making them radio antenna's that mount on light poles so they're way harder to see or reach. The camera function will get removed, since it isn't needed anyway.

[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 2 points 2 hours ago

Since one goal is to make this such an expensive headache, not for Flock exactly, but for the cities paying for Flock, I don't think a light post should give anyone pause beyond proper PPE.

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Theyre already on light poles I'm petty sure. My flock detector went off in a part of a road that's only trees and utility poles

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

people will start cutting down utilities, and then people will get really mad about such volatile devices being placed on critical infrastructure

[–] aeiou@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No, they've already released the next step - it's a drone that watches from 2 kilofeet up.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Guess I have to start training on shooting at a 45 degree angle up, instead of head on.

Thanks for the tip!

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 4 points 7 hours ago

I ain’t did it, I ain’t know who did it, and I ain’t never gonna convict anybody charged for doing this or any similar so-called crime if I’m on the jury

load more comments
view more: next ›