this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
145 points (98.7% liked)

Linux

14798 readers
249 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] liinux@pawb.social 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Is strange that it took them SO long, Linux + DRM Platform is like the perfect combination

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

they went independent in December. i think its the new direction

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 weeks ago

no DRM Platform, but yes

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 4 weeks ago
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No thanks . . . but I'm glad that those of you who want it will be able to have it.

[–] lmuel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Why not? (Genuine question, maybe I can learn something about it I didn’t know)

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 4 points 4 weeks ago

Just an extra piece of software of no real benefit to me. I'm only interested in single-player offline games, and I prefer to organize what I have using a directory structure rather than someone else's GUI. I try to avoid installing anything I don't have any use for to avoid unnecessary disk bloat and just in case it drags along some daemon with a nasty security bug. If you actually want the features Galaxy offers, I'm not aware of anything evil about it.

[–] uthredii@programming.dev 2 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But why? Just contribute to Heroic instead.

[–] sicktriple@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They want to spend more money on their own launcher instead of just profiting from the existing FOSS one?
Couldn't they just buy some irrevocable licenses of ancient games to actually enable eternal preservation instead?

[–] sicktriple@programming.dev -1 points 3 weeks ago

I didn't say they were smart

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Probably just want to be able to control the user experience honestly. It's sort of what your average "consumer" expects. Maybe they could fork Heroic, but I don't really think that benefits either party long term, but I'm not super intimate on the long term life cycles of open source projects, perhaps there would be enough overlap still to offer good opportunities for up streaming despite the difference in design direction.

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Ooooooh. Super happy to see this. Gives us more options and being to buy games without DRM is really nice.