This is what regulatory capture looks like, folks. Many voting members “consult with or are employed by companies that could promote or dispense peptides,” the panel voted against FDA staff recommendations, and industry and financial incentives (including telehealth companies and influencers) played a visible role in testimony and market reactions
Wild Feed
A catch-all world journalism community for news, reports, blogs, editorials, and whatever.
-
Be cool to each other. Instance rules apply.
-
All posts should link to a *current, *good quality blog, article, editorial, listicle, research paper, or something that can be considered "news."
-
Post title should be the article title.
-
No misinformation or bigotry.
-
For paywalled media, please provide an archived link in the text body of the post.
-
Commenters who don't read the posted article may receive temporary bans. This is a community for informed discussion.
Tag if needed:
[NSFW] and [Content Warning - x] — At your discretion.
[D/M/Y] — If the publication is older than a month. You can just tag the year if the article is more than a year old.
[Month and/or year] — For old but relevant articles. Use your best judgement.
[Conspiracy Tuesday] — Conspiracy theories/occult themes/cryptids/pseudoscience. On Tuesdays.
[E-mail required] — If an e-mail is needed to sign in.
[Archive link in post] — For paywalls and account sign-ins, link the main article in the URL, paste the archive link in the text body.
*Current means the article contains the most up to date publically available information on the subject, within reason. Older publications are welcome as long as they include a date tag.
*Good quality means the source has a good reputation for accurate journalism with a reasonably clean fact checking record.
Check out !Independent_Media@lemmy.today for independent news from around the world or !indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works for Canadian independent publications.
All communities were created with the goal of increasing media literacy and media pluralism.
Sources posted here include:
https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/
apnews.com/
https://www.theguardian.com/international
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/us
Icon image by z0r0z on pixabay, depicting a silhouette of a world map on a paint-splattered background.
Banner image by Lucentius on pixabay, depicting crumpled newpapers.
This has been going on for a decade. The FDA was corrupted long ago.
Sure was! Only difference is now they're doing it all out in the open and all at once, so it's very, very easy to connect the dots even for those not paying attention.
2021: Biogen threatens to stop Alzheimer research unless their drug, aduhelm is approved.
FDA approves Aduhelm, despite advisory committee resigning in protest.
A few deaths from brain hemorrhage later, Aduhelm is done by 2023. No neurologist will prescribe it. It's OK, Biogen made $8B in stock pump and dumps, while writing off $230M in drug.
We learned a lesson, right?...nope, FDA did it again with Leqembi, except this time they didn't bother with an expert advisory committee. Once again, deaths from brain swelling and no real effect on disease.
It is as if they specifically seek new lows, as if corruption is the the new American expansionism. Forget going west.
Ask Bryan Johnson how the peptide fad worked out for him.